Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Approved.
This suggested edit was approved and applied to the post about 4 years ago by Charlie Brumbaugh‭.

10 / 255
In a stored procedure, is it possible to get the total number or rows updated by different statements?
I have a bunch of stored procedures that look like something this

```
CREATE PROCEDURE example()
BEGIN
    UPDATE STATEMENT A;
    UPDATE STATEMENT B;
    UPDATE STATEMENT C;
END//
```

When I run them through MySQLWorkbench after it completes they will return a response of,

```
5 row(s) affected
```

However that is only the count for the rows updated by the last statement, not all of the rows effected by the stored procedure.

Is there a way to write the stored procedure so that the number of rows effected will be the total number of rows instead of just the last update?

Suggested about 4 years ago by Alexei‭