Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Approved.
This suggested edit was approved and applied to the post about 22 hours ago by HeavyRain‭.

12 / 255
How to keep git blame ignored commits up to date?
  • When I make a separate commit for code cleanup / style changes, I can suppress that commit from `git blame` so that I can follow a file's history easily without getting distracted bu pure style changes. I do that by putting the cleanup commit's hash in a file and tell git to ignore those commits for blaming purposes:
  • ```sh
  • echo $the_full_hash >> .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • git config blame.ignoreRevsFile .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • ```
  • But at the time I make my cleanup commit, I don't have the hash yet, so I need an extra commit to update `.git-blame-ignore-revs`. I'd rather have that in the same commit.
  • Even if I can get the hash of my current working copy changes, adding that hash to `.git-blame-ignore-revs` would modify what I am committing, resulting in a different hash, as `.git-blame-ignore-revs` is also checked in.
  • On top of that, if I make 2 commits and then use github's PR squashing merge, my hash in `.git-blame-ignore-revs` is wrong as only the squashed commit makes it into git, not the individual ones.
  • How do people keep their `.git-blame-ignore-revs` up to date? Is there a better way than 2 commits?
  • When I make a separate commit for code cleanup / style changes, I can suppress that commit from `git blame` so that I can follow a file's history easily without getting distracted by pure style changes. I do that by putting the cleanup commit's hash in a file and tell git to ignore those commits for blaming purposes:
  • ```sh
  • echo $the_full_hash >> .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • git config blame.ignoreRevsFile .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • ```
  • But at the time I make my cleanup commit, I don't have the hash yet, so I need an extra commit to update `.git-blame-ignore-revs`. I'd rather have that in the same commit.
  • Even if I can get the hash of my current working copy changes, adding that hash to `.git-blame-ignore-revs` would modify what I am committing, resulting in a different hash, as `.git-blame-ignore-revs` is also checked in.
  • On top of that, if I make 2 commits and then use github's PR squashing merge, my hash in `.git-blame-ignore-revs` is wrong as only the squashed commit makes it into git, not the individual ones.
  • How do people keep their `.git-blame-ignore-revs` up to date? Is there a better way than 2 commits?

Suggested 1 day ago by Alexis Wilke‭