Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Approved.
This suggested edit was approved and applied to the post over 3 years ago by Alexei‭.

24 / 255
Multiple catches with almost the same code.
I find myself often writing code like this.
```C++
try {
  // code
}
catch( FailedReadException const & ex) {
  file.close();
  std::cerr << "Read failure " << ex.readFailure() << std::endl;
  std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutexFile);
  errorState = true;
}
catch( std::runtime_error const & ex) {
  file.close();
  std::cerr << "Read failure " << ex.what() << std::endl;
  std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutexFile);
  errorState = true;
}
catch(...) {
  file.close();
  std::cerr << "Read failure " << "unexpected error" << std::endl;
  std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutexFile);
  errorState = true;
}
```

I'd like to make it easier to read by factoring all that common code. I could use a function for that. But that moves the code away from where it is used. I'd rather have it there in the catch for easier reading.
Best I've come up with is this:
```C++
try {
  // code
}
#define CATCH(reason) {\
  file.close(); \
  std::cerr << "Read failure " << reason << std::endl; \
  std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(mutexFile); \
  errorState = true; \
}
catch( FailedReadException const & ex)
  CATCH(ex.readFailure())
catch( std::runtime_error const & ex)
  CATCH(ex.what())
catch(...) 
  CATCH("unexpected error")
#undef CATCH
```
Is there a better way to do this?

Suggested over 3 years ago by Ayxan Haqverdili‭