Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Angewâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answer | — |
A: When to use custom iterators versus pointers > However, I suspect that most iterators can be written as iterating over an array. From my experience, I wouldn't expect this to be the case. From the standard library containers, only `std::vector` and `std::array` can work with iterators implemented as pointers. All the other containers have... (more) |
— | 6 days ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Destroy std::mutex referenced but not owned by std::unique_lock? No, such an operation is not safe. The documentation of `std::uniquelock` in the standard states that it's UB for the mutex do be destroyed while the lock still has a pointer to it. However, there is a way to dissociate the mutex from the lock: calling `release` on the lock. That resets the lock's... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |