Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Oleg Valter
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #289043 |
@#64656 well, I hope I am still in good standing there, so it shouldn't be a big deal. Otherwise, I can surely survive removal (that would actually be helpful) or voting (never had any issue with that). (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289039 |
Unfortunately, that would not be a viable option for me (if one checks my name over on SO, they'll know why — I'd gladly expand it, but the character limit is rather strict there). I did opt for an alternative, though, which is to add the following to the profile info (with links):
> Due to the ac... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289043 |
Good point regarding linking back to the "original" content to keep readers in the know regarding the fact that both authors are one and the same. Also a good idea to link from the SO post back to this one (or these ones, should the conclusion be that it needs to be split, which seems to be the major... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289019 |
I quite like the idea of splitting — after all, the original arose from a set of circumstances unique to Stack Overflow (lots of duplicate Q&As [and we both know how problematic it is to link everything together there - in fact, there was a huge effort, and, I think, some of the users of our subcommu... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289021 |
No, I certainly do not dislike splitting the canonical into proper Q&As. In fact, that was (sort of) the plan after the original discussion, but, for various reasons, it never came to fruition. Given that Codidact lacks content in this niche, it might be the best way to proceed — after all, it would ... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289019 |
Thankfully, this Q&A is 100% my original content — I double-checked whether anyone edited the question or any of the answers, and the answer is no (despite being made a wiki from the start, it being closed for half its lifecycle, the notice that it's under discussion, etc. contributed to that). (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289021 |
I highly suspect that I will not be able remove the content from SO to in the first place, yeah. I rarely delete content (2 times total across all the years spent on the network), so am a bit fuzzy on the rules even if I do know them. Hadn't bother to check initially, but have done so a couple of min... (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289016 |
That's another idea I am entertaining — do you think it would be a good idea to try to get the best of both worlds and both split the reference into individual Q&A components and to add an article as a sort of entry point more focused on triage? (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
Comment | Post #289016 |
Yeah, that's a viable option that I am considering, especially given that it'll pretty much fill the whole niche of content if done properly. Requiring more work is basically a non-issue for me, as I'll be more than happy to do that work should that be the direction to go. (more) |
— | 10 months ago |