Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Activity for Emily‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Edit Post #291036 Initial revision 2 months ago
Answer A: Why does bash seem to parse `sh -c` commands differently when called via `execl`?
Because `execl`'s first argument isn't `argv[0]`. `execl("/bin/sh", "-c", ...)` runs the executable `/bin/sh`, but sets its `argv[0]` to `"-c"`, as if one had created a link called `-c` pointing at it and run that. The correct way to do this is `execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", ...)`. Busybox works...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #291035 Post edited:
2 months ago
Edit Post #291035 Initial revision 2 months ago
Question Why does bash seem to parse `sh -c` commands differently when called via `execl`?
When I do this in a shell: ```plain $ /bin/sh -c 'echo hello world' hello world ``` it's my understanding that I'm running a process with `argv = {"/bin/sh", "-c", "echo hello world"}`. That is, the quotes cause all three words to be passed as one argument to `sh`, and that instance of `sh` is r...
(more)
2 months ago
Edit Post #290010 Post edited:
rm stray extra question mark
7 months ago
Edit Post #290011 Initial revision 7 months ago
Answer A: How do I share a type between a client and server, but make a specific field optional for one and required for the other?
This can be done using conditional types. I defined these helper types: ```typescript enum Role { server, client }; type PossiblyHiddenFromClients = T | (R extends Role.client ? undefined : never); ``` When R is `server`, this type reduces to `T` (via `T | never`); when R is `client`...
(more)
7 months ago
Edit Post #290010 Initial revision 7 months ago
Question How do I share a type between a client and server, but make a specific field optional for one and required for the other?
Let's say I have a client/server application with a data structure on the server side: ```typescript type User = { name: string; superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string; }; ``` These fields are both non-nullable; all users in this system have a `name` and a `superSecretGovernmentIdNumber...
(more)
7 months ago
Comment Post #289737 Hrm. I definitely learned some things, but I think I phrased this specific question far too generally for them to make sense as answers to it. I may sit down at some point this week and distill them into a few separate self-answered questions.
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #289737 Probably wouldn't have helped in this case, depending on whether I got lucky and copied the right rows. The answer for this particular query (which I eventually found via extensive use of commenting things out and staring really hard) wound up being a series of joins that *looked* (to both me and `EX...
(more)
8 months ago
Comment Post #289741 Edited `SELECT` into the question for clarity, thanks. The query in question is mostly autogenerated at runtime, and is a search with arbitrary user inputs, but the complexity is entirely due to the application I work on having abnormally complicated visibility permission rules (it's bad even with...
(more)
8 months ago
Edit Post #289737 Post edited:
8 months ago
Edit Post #289737 Post edited:
clarity
8 months ago
Edit Post #289737 Initial revision 8 months ago
Question Alternatives to `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` for queries that won't complete
I have a large and complex PostgreSQL `SELECT` query that I would like to make faster. `EXPLAIN` suggests it should run quickly, with the worst parts being scans of a few thousand rows. When run, it does not complete in any reasonable amount of time (if `statementtimeout` is set to infinite, it event...
(more)
8 months ago