Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Michaelâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suggested Edit | Post #291533 |
Suggested edit: Fix typo. Block quotes in case we get viml syntax highlighting sometime. (more) |
helpful | 10 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291155 |
Post edited: Tone down some language. Subheadings rather than list items. |
— | 11 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291479 |
Post edited: Semantic headings. Footnote. |
— | 11 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #291479 |
Suggested edit: Semantic headings. Footnote. (more) |
helpful | 11 months ago |
| Edit | Post #290490 |
Post edited: Bulletize the Upshot. Move the chart above the first heading. |
— | 11 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291433 |
How far have you gotten in your attempts? What seemed promising? (more) |
— | 11 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291277 |
Post edited: Fix the last code block. A bit more formatting here and there. |
— | 12 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #291277 |
Suggested edit: Fix the last code block. A bit more formatting here and there. (more) |
helpful | 12 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291271 |
Post edited: headings. |
— | 12 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291272 |
Post edited: Proofreading. Add new tag. Searchable text for the tech elements. |
— | 12 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #291272 |
Suggested edit: Proofreading. Add new tag. Searchable text for the tech elements. (more) |
helpful | 12 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291269 |
Post edited: Lots of proofreading |
— | 12 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #291269 |
Suggested edit: Lots of proofreading (more) |
helpful | 12 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291271 | Initial revision | — | 12 months ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Understanding the Matrix protocol vs Matrix server and what can be implemented from scratch Specification You understand correctly. [Matrix][] is an interface for federated encrypted communication. From the first page of the spec: > Matrix defines a set of open APIs for decentralised communication, suitable for securely publishing, persisting and subscribing to data over a global open... (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Edit | Post #281415 |
Post edited: Fix table markdown |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291235 |
If you _really_ hate leftover `.gitkeep`, you can write a commit (or push) hook that rejects commits where `.gitkeep` isn't the only file in its directory. (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #281415 |
Suggested edit: Fix table markdown (more) |
helpful | 12 months ago |
| Edit | Post #291211 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Question | — |
Filter stashes by pathspec The documentation for `git stash list` says > ### [`list []`][doc] > List the stash entries that you currently have. Each stash entry is listed with its name (e.g. `stash@{0}` is the latest entry, `stash@{1}` is the one before, etc.), the name of the branch that was current when the entry was mad... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291209 |
Post edited: Fix pseudocode sample in case of multiple answers per question. |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291209 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How to easily support time frame grouping in queries? In SQL Server 2022+, there's a dedicated binning function called `DATEBUCKET`. > Each of these statements increments `DATEBUCKET` with a bucket width of `1` from the origin time: > > ```sql > DECLARE @date DATETIME2 = '2020-04-30 21:21:21'; > SELECT 'Week', DATEBUCKET(WEEK, 1, @date) > UNION ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291196 |
Post edited: Semantic headings |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #291196 |
Suggested edit: Semantic headings (more) |
helpful | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290998 |
Post edited: More research |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291155 |
Post edited: Clarify good-first |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291155 |
Post edited: Delete remnant of deleted footnote. |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #291155 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What is a reasonable minimum for making a FOSS project inviting to contributors? Matthew's list is pretty good, although I don't think one has to do all the things on it as a "minimum." I offer one minimum and a couple nice-to-haves. Some of these I have learned as a contributor; some as a maintainer. Must Don't be a jerk When people engage with your project, don't be dism... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #291125 |
> I'll definitely post them as answers instead.
Please do! Even if others answer the question later, it makes it easier for them to refer to your answer in a link if it already exists, rather than quoting text from the question that you may move to an answer later. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #289725 |
When I wanted to read the objects, I dumped a parallel file to JSON for convenience, but I haven't ever needed to update my pickles by hand. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290995 |
Post edited: Direct page link |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290998 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: GnuTLS config for my own root CA, for use on internal server Does GnuTLS support CA Name Constraints (RFC 5280, 4.2.1.10), so you can limit the valid domains directly in the root CA? I'm not aware of any CAs that self-limit this way,[^moz] except for when the US government tried (unsuccessfully?) to get one approved by the CA/B forum for `.gov` and `.mil`. ... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #290995 |
Suggested edit: Direct page link (more) |
helpful | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290992 |
Does GnuTLS support [CA Name Constraints](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5280#section-4.2.1.10), so you can limit the valid domains directly in the root CA? (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290818 |
Post edited: Prettyprint language that CD understands |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #290818 |
Suggested edit: Prettyprint language that CD understands (more) |
helpful | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290747 |
Possessing a good answer is not itself indicative of a good question. I have downvoted some questions where I upvoted the Asker's self-answer. _This_ question is too broad. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #290786 |
I don't know that you're going to get anything more helpful than the test you already did. You could trawl the Bash changelogs to see if they indicate that the behavior was ever different, but "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290587 |
Post edited: Link the Git mailing list |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290587 |
Post edited: Move the analogs to the top of each section. Explicitly mention email. |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290652 | Initial revision | — | about 1 year ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should a salt be stored in the same database as the hash? With bcrypt, the salt is stored in the same string as the hash. This is done so that you have everything you need to get that hash identifier if you know the password.[^pepper] Wikipedia breaks down the format: > ## Description > The input to the bcrypt function is the password string (up to 72 b... (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290490 |
Post edited: Hack a second paragraph into a footnote. Stress password reuse again. Beg service operators to be good. |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #285566 |
If the criteria for your log isn't expensive in its own right, you could just ask `git log` to stop after a certain number of commits are found. `-50` or something. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290097 |
Post edited: Change "single" to "only," lest it be interpreted as "single quoting" |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290587 |
Post edited: Ugh. Proofreading |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Edit | Post #290587 |
Post edited: Some intro text. |
— | about 1 year ago |
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next →