Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for dustytrashâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278809 |
The user doesn't need to worry about escaping quotes, and using quotes for arguments containing spaces with capturing input (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278551 |
I'd like no manual work if the JSON changes. It does not matter if recompilation is needed on updates (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278551 |
Post edited: Fixed example to be actual example. I realized it could be relavent, I don't actually need to access fields from the classes, just reference the classes |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278551 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278551 |
Post edited: clarified where JSON data is coming from |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278551 |
Post edited: added an example showing the classes need to be used like any other class |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278551 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278551 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Handling JSON files in Rust without manually creating mapping classes I have JSON that looks something like this: {"id":"n-fsdf-6b6", "name":"JohnSmith", "revisionDate":1591072274000} The JSON data is named `CharacterInfo`. It comes from a static external URL. The structure of this information could be changed, as it comes from an outside source and... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278454 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Should we have a Code Review Section / category? As discussed on Meta, should Software.codidact allow reviewing working code as a question? Traffic is probably not high enough to warrant it's own Codereview community. The existing communities out there for reviewing code are not well known. New users may even view this as a new idea & it differe... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |