Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Which platforms return a non-null pointer on malloc(0)

Parent

Which platforms return a non-null pointer on malloc(0)

+4
−2

What is the portability of malloc(0);?

  • Which platforms return NULL without setting errno?
  • Which platforms return a non-null pointer?
  • Do any platforms have some other behavior?
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

realloc(ptr, 0) (1 comment)
Post
+3
−0

It is trivial enough to test:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>

#define KNOWN_GARBAGE ((int*)~0u)

int main (void)
{
  int* ptr = KNOWN_GARBAGE;
  ptr = malloc(0);
  int errno_changed = errno;

  if(ptr == NULL)
    puts("Returned NULL.");
  else if(ptr == KNOWN_GARBAGE)
    puts("Didn't modify the pointer, non-conforming?");
  else
    puts("Returned non-zero, modified the pointer.");
  if(errno_changed)
    printf("Weird use of errno detected, error code 0x%X\n", errno_changed);
}

Then try it with whatever compiler, version, standard lib and system you want. The vast majority of gcc-like compilers + libc flavours appear to return a new non-zero address.

The setting errno part appears to be some old Unix gunk from the 90s according to man(?), so you may have to find some sufficiently obscure computer for that, I guess.


Related to this question: C no longer has standard support for realloc(ptr, 0) since C23 likely comes with major defects here. See realloc(ptr, 0) in C23 - now what?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

re: give me a list (18 comments)
realloc(ptr, 0) (2 comments)
realloc(ptr, 0)
alx‭ wrote 3 months ago

Hmmm, it is Undefined Behavior now. That's a bad thing. I think it should have been reworded to be a more generic implementation-defined behavior without making it UB.

I'll have that in mind, and might send a proposal to fix it. Thanks!

Lundin‭ wrote 3 months ago

Rather, nobody knows what exactly it is, because the changes to the standard were of such poor quality that it's all over the place...