Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Differences between SO and Codidact for NEW USERS (first impression feedback)?

Parent

Differences between SO and Codidact for NEW USERS (first impression feedback)?

+1
−2

What makes Codidact truly different from Stack Overflow? I understand that Codidact is an organization that has created open-source software for Q&A sites, while SE is a for-profit organization. However, from an end-user perspective, this is largely irrelevant. I visited the site and found it to be extremely similar to SO, along with all of its pros and cons, especially those related to new users.

I created an account here, but as initial feedback, I can say that I already feel accused. The first message I received from the system didn't take long to remind me of my limitations and what I need to do to remove them. I had the impression that I had just signed up for a job, not for an account on a Q&A site.

What does Codidact do differently for new users compared to SO, besides allowing them to gain negative reputation?

I'm leaving this question as initial feedback only; I don't think I'm interested in contributing further to the site because I found the first impression a bit aggressive.

History

1 comment thread

What message? (1 comment)
Post
+0
−5
What makes Codidact truly different from Stack Overflow?

This question asks to compare your lemonade to the glass my orange juice is in.

Stack Overflow is one Q&A forum of many within Stack Exchange. Codidact is the larger web site that hosts various Q&A forums of its own. The specific Stack Exchange site you ask about, Stack Overflow, happens to be about programming. At Codidact, there is a Q&A forum called "Software Development" that is roughly similar to Stack Overflow.

It could be reasonable to compare the Stack Overflow and Software Development Q&A sites, or the Stack Exchange and Codidact hosting sites. But, trying to compare Stack Overflow with Codidact makes no sense.

History

1 comment thread

While technically true, this isn't an answer of the user's intended question so much as it is a nitpi... (3 comments)
While technically true, this isn't an answer of the user's intended question so much as it is a nitpi...
Sylvester‭ wrote 11 months ago

While technically true, this isn't an answer of the user's intended question so much as it is a nitpick on their grammar/choice of words, which is completely unhelpful.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote 11 months ago

We can only go by what is asked. The question either displays a lack of understanding of the overall structure of Stack Exchange and Codidact and how individual Q&A forums fit within that, or gross sloppiness by the OP. I gave the OP the benefit of the doubt and provided a useful answer for the first case.

You assume sloppy writing, which is likely the result of sloppy thinking. In that case the question should be downvoted and possibly closed as the OP is not deserving of an answer.

Clarity and attention to detail matter.

Sylvester‭ wrote 11 months ago · edited 11 months ago

I do agree, the question was poorly written, and pretty passive-aggressive in its own right. Suffice it to say the question would've been better off either being directly addressed for clarification or closing, or just left unanswered.