Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Strategy to migrate meaningful content from Stack Overflow

Parent

Strategy to migrate meaningful content from Stack Overflow

+7
−1

I was thinking about meaningful content that can be migrated (+ improved) from Stack Overflow. These categories pop into my mind:

  • closed questions: we know Stack Overflow is very picky when it comes to some matters ("primarily opinion based") and some questions are easily closed despite being very useful (lots of views, upvotes and great answers). Examples I have already migrated with an updated answer are How to upgrade a recent (>= 8) Angular CLI? and Is it recommended for ASP.NET Web API actions to always include a CancellationToken?.

  • questions with great, but almost invisible "late" answers: SO acknowledges the value of late answers (Necromancer badge), but in practice, they are rarely visible and folks will often use the most upvoted answer which is not always the best / up to date.

I am thinking about migrating some of these questions + what I think is the best answer as I stumble across such cases. However, I am also looking for community feedback if such an effort makes sense. Personally, I would gladly migrate some of my own late answers, as I sometimes use (and maybe update) them for current projects.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+5
−0

Note: This is not an official Codidact staff answer; this is my personal opinion.


Let's try to build up a bit of an original base before we work on imports.

Based on other sites where content was imported - such as Writing or SciSpec - the site does better when you first work on building up local content instead of seeding the site with external content.

I would recommend first working on building up some Q&A here and making sure there's actually a userbase before importing.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
General comments
Lundin‭ wrote about 4 years ago

I agree. Writing some self-answered Q&A on topics you know well seems to be a good way to get a site up and running. Shows that there is good content and active users, whereas imported posts don't really say anything about the state of the site at all.

Trilarion‭ wrote almost 3 years ago · edited almost 3 years ago

Also, even imported content must further be curated (kept uptodate) which requires users to work on it. So we mostly need to grow the number of users I would say now, not so much the content even though both are related.