Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Should we have a Code Review Section / category?

Parent

Should we have a Code Review Section / category?

+10
−0

As discussed on Meta, should Software.codidact allow reviewing working code as a question?

Traffic is probably not high enough to warrant it's own Codereview community. The existing communities out there for reviewing code are not well known. New users may even view this as a new idea & it differentiates software.codidact from other software communities.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+6
−0

I would definitely allow code review questions (requests) as they are an important part of any professional software developer.

A special category might make sense, although a designated special tag (code-review) might be enough if it also results in a special highlight for at least for the tag.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (5 comments)
General comments
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 4 years ago

A category can define tags that get special styling, like bug/discussion/feature-request/support here on meta. (It's one special style, not different styles for different groups of tags.) So Q&A could make code-review stand out like that, along with any other future tags that should be treated specially. // A new category can share a tag set with Q&A, meaning that searching by tags would show posts from both categories. But different categories means different question lists.

Lundin‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Monica Cellio Can each category get custom close reasons? See the discussion in comments below my posted answer.

President James K. Polk‭ wrote about 4 years ago

I agree. I think code review questions should not be in their own site, they belong right with all the other software development questions unless it should prove to be completely unworkable.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 4 years ago

Tangent, but I don't have another way to contact you: Alexei, you're pretty active here, so I want to make sure you're aware of https://software.codidact.com/questions/278470. Interested?

Canina‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago

For what it's worth, while it looks reasonable at first glance, my experience is that at least Somewhere Else, using tags to segregate types of content (specifically in the case I have in mind, different requirements placed on answers) has worked poorly in practice. A separate category seems likely to work out better, even (or maybe especially) if it is low traffic.