Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Comments on Should we have a Code Review Section / category?
Parent
Should we have a Code Review Section / category?
As discussed on Meta, should Software.codidact allow reviewing working code as a question?
Traffic is probably not high enough to warrant it's own Codereview community. The existing communities out there for reviewing code are not well known. New users may even view this as a new idea & it differentiates software.codidact from other software communities.
Post
I agree and I think it should be a separate category, with separate posting rules. There are several examples of how the rules for each category would likely be fundamentally different:
Main Q&A category
- Encourages minimal examples to reproduce the problem, particularly when asking for debug help.
- It is fine to post questions seeking help to fix code which isn't working.
- Allows theoretical or big picture questions such as algorithm theory or program design.
- Can ask what code written by others does/works.
Code review category
- Encourages posting the complete code as-is, with no modifications.
- All code must be compiled and tested, with no known bugs.
- Must contain code.
- The poster should be the author of the code and describe what it does as part of the question.
0 comment threads