Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Code Reviews Meta
Meta
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on I object to [stl]

Post

I object to [stl]

+4
−2

Currently the tag [stl] is marked as a sub-tag of c++, implying a meaning of "standard-template-library". However I see both of the questions currently using the tag mean the 3D object description format.

As I see it both meanings are relevant to Software Development and there are very different. So the tag need disambiguation.

I suggest [c++-stl] for the C++ library and [stl-format] for the object description language, but I'm open to other suggestions.

discussion tags
posted over 3 years ago
3y ago
user card
dmckee‭
673 reputation 5 9 80 17
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (6 comments)
General comments
dmckee‭ wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago
copy link

Am I to take it that people don’t care for my (allegedly funny) title, or do people really think this ambiguity is OK?

Moshi‭ wrote over 3 years ago
copy link

@dmckee Probably the title. I take no issue with the content, but I'd suggest [c++-stl] and [stl-format] to further disambiguate

dmckee‭ wrote over 3 years ago
copy link

@Moshi Yeah. That's better.

Moshi‭ wrote over 3 years ago
copy link

@dmckee I've create an [stl-format] tag and manually retagged the relevent questions.

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago
copy link

Is STL a thing in C++ still though? Has it not been swallowed up by the "standard library" just like everything else? Why do we need a tag for it to begin with?

dmckee‭ wrote over 3 years ago
copy link

@Lundin Well, the containers and algorithms template code has certainly been folded in with the rest of the standard library. On SomeplaceElse I read that tag as "I want to ask about the templated parts of the standard library and not just about c++ features in the raw", which I consider to be useful information about the question. Is there a better name for the tag?