Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on How to show XML in browser?

Post

How to show XML in browser?

+2
−2

Is there possible way to run XML like as HTML? Suppose, I have following code.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<breakfast_menu>
<food>
    <name>Belgian Waffles</name>
    <price>$5.95</price>
    <description>
   Two of our famous Belgian Waffles with plenty of real maple syrup
   </description>
    <calories>650</calories>
</food>
<food>
    <name>Strawberry Belgian Waffles</name>
    <price>$7.95</price>
    <description>
    Light Belgian waffles covered with strawberries and whipped cream
    </description>
    <calories>900</calories>
</food>
<food>
    <name>Berry-Berry Belgian Waffles</name>
    <price>$8.95</price>
    <description>
    Belgian waffles covered with assorted fresh berries and whipped cream
    </description>
    <calories>900</calories>
</food>
<food>
    <name>French Toast</name>
    <price>$4.50</price>
    <description>
    Thick slices made from our homemade sourdough bread
    </description>
    <calories>600</calories>
</food>
<food>
    <name>Homestyle Breakfast</name>
    <price>$6.95</price>
    <description>
    Two eggs, bacon or sausage, toast, and our ever-popular hash browns
    </description>
    <calories>950</calories>
</food>
</breakfast_menu>

Now, I want to see it in browser. I don't want to use C# or any other language with it. I only wants to use XML. I had visited the link..

Like : file:///home/name/xml/index.xml

Then I got the message

This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below. output

That's not what I expected. I wanted to show list of foods rather than code.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Which browser did you use? (5 comments)
Which browser did you use?
Alexei‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Which browser did you use to "display" the XML? If I remember correctly, some of them display a "pretty-print" version by default, even if no schema is specified.

Anonymous‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Google Chrome...

hkotsubo‭ wrote over 2 years ago · edited over 2 years ago

I'm using Chrome and, although it shows the same message you've got, it actually shows the XML, see: https://software.codidact.com/uploads/LqhGnpwbtbMQ3wuTCWePjTua - that said, what exactly is your browsing showing and what did you expect to see?

Anonymous‭ wrote over 2 years ago

hkotsubo‭ Yes! I got the same output. But, it wasn't what I expected. I had expected this output which doesn't show without CSS

hkotsubo‭ wrote over 2 years ago · edited over 2 years ago

In that case, I suggest you to edit the question and make it more clear what happened. As currently written, it gives the impression that the XML is not displayed at all (at least I had this impression)