Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Should I check if pointer parameters are null pointers?

Post

Should I check if pointer parameters are null pointers?

+11
−0

When writing any form of custom function such as this:

void func (int* a, int* b)

Should I add code to check if a and b are null pointers or not?

if(a == NULL)
/* error handling */

When posting code for code reviews, one frequent comment is that such checks against null should be added for robustness. However, these reviewers are then just as often corrected by others telling them to not add such checks because they are bad practice.

What should be done? Is there an universal policy to check or not to check, or should this be done on case-to-case basis?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

I don't think this is enough for a full-fledged answer, but I think adding debug `assert`s for testin... (1 comment)
I don't think this is enough for a full-fledged answer, but I think adding debug `assert`s for testin...
ghost-in-the-zsh‭ wrote almost 2 years ago

I don't think this is enough for a full-fledged answer, but I think adding debug asserts for testing, that get removed on release builds is a good approach. In general, clear documentation about what functions expect and leaving it to the caller should be fine.