Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on How do I find disjoint sets in a dataset

Parent

How do I find disjoint sets in a dataset

+6
−0

I have a dataset of car bookings like this:

car_id user_id
1 1
2 1
1 2
3 3
1 2
3 3

In this dataset, two separate groups/sets of cars and users don't overlap: One group consists of two vehicles (1,2) and two users (1,2) the other group has only one car (3) and one user (3). The groups are independent and have no overlap in users or vehicles. Lines in the datasets can repeat.

Now I have a much bigger dataset with many thousands of cars and users. What is the most elegant/fastest algorithm/data structure to find those disjunct groups?

I code in Python or Julia.


I read the paper and implemented the RemSP algorithm, partly because I like algorithms, and it was cool that RemSP is so much faster than the rest of the algorithms presented. However, the processing around the results of it is noticeable. Also, I am confused because RemSP is for merging sets. I try to find independent groups. That is not the same.

Here is my code - did you have something more immediate in mind when recommending RemSP?

(How is pasting code supposed to work here? This markup seems to be an ill fit for code.)

def remsp(p, x, y):
    rx = x
    ry = y
    
    while p[rx] != p[ry]:
        if p[rx] < p[ry]:
            if rx == p[rx]:
                p[rx] = p[ry]
                break
            z = rx
            p[rx] = p[ry]
            rx = p[z]
        else:
            if ry == p[ry]:
                p[ry] = p[rx]
                break
            z = ry
            p[ry] = p[rx]
            ry = p[z]
    
    return p

def find(p, x):
    if x != p[x]:
        p[x] = find(p, p[x])
    return p[x]

def get_sets(p):
    sets = {}
    for x in p.keys():
        root = find(p, x)
        if root not in sets:
            sets[root] = (set(), set())
        
        if x.startswith("car"):
            sets[root][0].add(x)
        else:
            sets[root][1].add(x)
    
    return sets.values()

# Dataset of car bookings (car_id, user_id)
bookings = [
    ("car_1", "user_1"),
    ("car_2", "user_1"),
    ("car_1", "user_2"),
    ("car_3", "user_3"),
    ("car_1", "user_2"),
    ("car_3", "user_3")
]

# Initialize parent array
p = {item: item for booking in bookings for item in booking}

# Process bookings
for car_id, user_id in bookings:
    # Merge sets containing car_id and user_id
    remsp(p, car_id, user_id)
    
    # Merge sets of all cars and users connected through user_id
    for car_id2, user_id2 in bookings:
        if user_id == user_id2:
            remsp(p, car_id, car_id2)
        if car_id == car_id2:
            remsp(p, user_id, user_id2)

# Get separate sets
sets = get_sets(p)
for s in sets:
    print(s)
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−0

Your example is a bipartite graph in adjacency list format. The cars are nodes on the left, the people are nodes on the right. When a person "has" a car, there is an edge between the car and person. Your question is equivalent to asking for the connected components of the graph.

This can be done with standard algorithms like Depth First Search in O(n+m) time (nodes+edges). You can find implementations in libraries like NetworkX.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Nice, simple answer (1 comment)
Nice, simple answer
Derek Elkins‭ wrote 10 months ago

+1 Simpler answer than mine.