Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Does Snowflake NATURAL JOIN support outer-style join?

Parent

Does Snowflake NATURAL JOIN support outer-style join?

+2
−0

I like using NATURAL JOIN in Snowflake, because I find it more elegant than explicit join clauses.

However, it appears that the natural join behaves similar to an inner join, in that null values of the join key(s) are dropped. In some cases, I want to do a natural join, but I want to include columns where the join key is a null. I tried OUTER NATURAL JOIN since Snowflake syntax appears to support it:

A NATURAL JOIN can be combined with an OUTER JOIN.

But when I tried, it still dropped nulls.

Is the concept of a natural join fundamentally opposed to retaining nulls? Or is there a way to do it?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+0
−0

Snowflake's NATURAL JOIN follows the SQL standard in that it is simply an (inner) equi-join with implied column names. (This is discouraged as it's safer and clearer to just explicitly write the join condition.) See Snowflake join docs. In the equality comparison, NULLs will not be retained. The outer join may still add back in NULLs for unmatched rows.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Docs imply it can be done (2 comments)
Docs imply it can be done
matthewsnyder‭ wrote over 1 year ago

I edited the question to make it clearer why the docs sound (at least to me) like it can be done.

qwr‭ wrote over 1 year ago

I don't have access to a Snowflake db. But natural outer join should be like an outer join with equality condition. Can you test on some test data and post your query?