Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Is it undefined behaviour to just make a pointer point outside boundaries of an array without dereferencing it?

Post

Is it undefined behaviour to just make a pointer point outside boundaries of an array without dereferencing it?

+6
−0

I have heard that it is undefined behaviour to make a pointer point outside boundaries of an array even without dereferencing it. Can that really be true? Consider this code:

int main(void) 
{
    char arr[10];
    char *ptr = &arr[-1];
    char c = *ptr;
}

The line char c = *ptr is obviously bad, because it's accessing out of bounds. But I heard something that even the second line char *ptr = &arr[-1] invokes undefined behaviour? Is this true? What does the standard say?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (5 comments)
General comments
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Your example might be better if you referenced arr[10] instead of arr[-1]. That eliminates issues of signed versus unsigned arithmetic of array subscripts, which it sounds like is not what you are trying to ask about.

klutt‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@olinlathrop Except that arr[10] is legal to point at, but not arr[11] ;) I mostly posted this question to get this site going.

Skipping 1 deleted comment.

klutt‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@kami Nope, that line is exactly as it should be.

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Actually, char *ptr = arr[-1]; is not valid, there needs to be an & or it's a constraint violation of simple assignment. I didn't think of it when I originally answered the question.

Kami‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@klutt sneaky edit is sneaky :P I really miss a note when the last edit was...