Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Subfolders for package-less module imports

Post

Subfolders for package-less module imports

+4
−1

Is there some sane way to allow Python to import from subfolders in projects that don't have a package?

I have many Python programs that I implemented as Python files inside a directory, without a setup.py file or other packaging boilerplate. I don't pip install these. Simply doing cd into the directory, and running files with python some_script.py is much more convenient.

The problem is when the program grows and I need modularize it. Python files can import other files in the same directory, but not in subdirectories. Alas, subdirectories are sometimes very useful.

How do you get Python files to import files from other directories? Is creating a package unavoidable in this case?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Unclear due to possible hidden misconception (4 comments)
have you tried __init__.py files? (3 comments)
have you tried __init__.py files?
mr Tsjolder‭ wrote 6 months ago

Is adding a(n empty) __init__.py file in each subdirectory considered to be too much overhead? After all, this is the only thing necessary to make Python interpret a directory as a Python package.

Karl Knechtel‭ wrote 6 months ago

In fact, this is not necessary since Python 3.3, although this particular piece of misinformation has proven very persistent. In contemporary Python, recognition of "packages" is automatic. Adding an __init__.py file simply distinguishes a "regular package" from a "namespace package", which mandates that all the contents of the package are in the same subdirectory (namespace packages allow the package contents to be split across folders on disk). Some tools may also offer specific support for regular packages - but overall, the distinction is relatively subtle.

Aside from that, the problem isn't simply with recognizing that a folder represents a tree of Python modules - Python also has to be instructed to consider the root of that tree when looking for absolute imports.

mr Tsjolder‭ wrote 6 months ago

I must admit that I shortly forgot about that, but it could be that the OP is actually using a Python version < 3.3 and is therefore having problems...