Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A What's the difference between null pointers and NULL?

In short, NULL is the 0 value, and a null pointer is a pointer variable that points to nothing. some systems allowing a different representation of the null pointer other than zero Years back...

posted 3y ago by sonofel‭  ·  edited 3y ago by EJP‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar EJP‭ · 2020-12-14T13:46:52Z (over 3 years ago)
  • In short, NULL is the 0 value, and a null pointer (void *) is a pointer variable that points to nothing.
  • > some systems allowing a different representation of the null pointer other than zero
  • Years back compilers implemented some things on their own, partly because the language standards weren't strictly defined and imposed. For instance, I remember using a compiler that handled ```random``` related implementations in a different manner than other compilers. So, while some compilers defined their own null pointer implementation, NULL was always 0.
  • > Can NULL be something other than zero?
  • No, I don't think so. However, you can tweak a compiler to replace instances of NULL with a value other than 0, but that wouldn't be a standard C compiler then.
  • In short, NULL is the 0 value, and a null pointer is a pointer variable that points to nothing.
  • > some systems allowing a different representation of the null pointer other than zero
  • Years back compilers implemented some things on their own, partly because the language standards weren't strictly defined and imposed. For instance, I remember using a compiler that handled ```random``` related implementations in a different manner than other compilers. So, while some compilers defined their own null pointer implementation, NULL was always 0.
  • > Can NULL be something other than zero?
  • No, I don't think so. However, you can tweak a compiler to replace instances of NULL with a value other than 0, but that wouldn't be a standard C compiler then.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar sonofel‭ · 2020-10-20T13:00:22Z (over 3 years ago)
In short, NULL is the 0 value, and a null pointer (void *) is a pointer variable that points to nothing.


 >  some systems allowing a different representation of the null pointer other than zero

Years back compilers implemented some things on their own, partly because the language standards weren't strictly defined and imposed. For instance, I remember using a compiler that handled ```random``` related implementations in a different manner than other compilers. So, while some compilers defined their own null pointer implementation, NULL was always 0.


 > Can NULL be something other than zero?

No, I don't think so. However, you can tweak a compiler to replace instances of NULL with a value other than 0, but that wouldn't be a standard C compiler then.