Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

73%
+9 −2
Meta Growing software.codidact

I've been thinking about how the community might bring more contributors to software.codidact. One of the ways is to simply pitch codidact in questions, answers, and comments in stackoverflow. I'm ...

2 answers  ·  posted 3y ago by President James K. Polk‭  ·  last activity 3y ago by Lundin‭

Question discussion
#1: Initial revision by user avatar President James K. Polk‭ · 2020-10-31T15:32:31Z (over 3 years ago)
Growing software.codidact
I've been thinking about how the community might bring more contributors to software.codidact. One of the ways is to simply pitch codidact in questions, answers, and comments in stackoverflow. I'm not sure if that is explicitly forbidden there, or frowned upon. Is making explicit pitches for software.codidact on stackoverflow a good idea?

The underlying premise is that this community wants to grow this site more rapidly. The alternative is what I'll call *natural growth*, where people find codidact by themselves. Obviously there needs to be a balance of people who only ask questions and knowledgable people willing to answer them, and I think natural growth is likely more likely to provide that balance. Do we want to grow software.codidact more rapidly than natural growth provides? If yes, what are some other ideas for growing the site?

Obviously these questions can apply to all the codidact sites, but I'm personally most interested in software.codidact.