Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

80%
+6 −0
Meta Are reference requests welcome here?

Just to stir the pot a little, on Physics SE we ended up allowing them within certain limits. Though I was against it I would say that the results were rather better than I expected. We did set u...

posted 3y ago by dmckee‭  ·  edited 3y ago by dmckee‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar dmckee‭ · 2020-11-02T23:58:20Z (over 3 years ago)
#1: Initial revision by user avatar dmckee‭ · 2020-11-02T20:41:33Z (over 3 years ago)
Just to stir the pot a little, on Physics SE when end up [allowing them within certain limits](https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4697/are-resource-recommendations-allowed/).

Though I was against it I would say that the results were rather better than I expected.

We did set up a post notice for the category that reads:

> **Before answering, please see our policy on resource recommendation questions.** Please write substantial answers that detail the style, content, and prerequisites of the book, paper or other resource. Explain the nature of the resource so that readers can decide which one is best suited for them rather than relying on the opinions of others. **Answers containing only a reference to a book or paper will be removed!**

Those question do attract some rather poor answer but the community usually does a good job of voting those down, and it doesn't take too much moderator effort to enforce the rule about expanding on the link.

After that experience my position here would be **"We have to set some ground rules if we're going to do that."** rather than an outright contrary position.