Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Search paths where all nodes are in a relationship with same node

+2
−0

Using the below graph as an example: I am trying to determine all Persons which are_sons of Persons all born in the same country. Graph

Is there an elegant way to achieve this with Cypher?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (4 comments)

1 answer

+3
−0

Something like this query should work for you:

MATCH (a:Person)-[:IS_SON]->()-[:WAS_BORN]->(b:Country)
WITH a, count(DISTINCT b) AS birthplaces
WHERE birthplaces = 1
RETURN a

Note that this query would return people who have parents with unknown birthplaces, since those paths won't be included in the MATCH clause. If you have that case in your database and want to exclude it, then I think you lose a little elegance:

MATCH (a:Person)-[:IS_SON]->(p:Person)
OPTIONAL MATCH (p)-[:WAS_BORN]->(b:Country)
WITH a, count(p) AS parents, count(b) AS birthplaces, count(DISTINCT b) as distinct_birthplaces
WHERE parents = birthplaces AND distinct_birthplaces = 1
RETURN a
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »