Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
We have a bunch of dead branches in our git repository, and I'd like to clean them up. Ones that were merged (but not deleted at the time) are easy; we can see those in the branch list on Bitbucke...
#2: Post edited
We have a bunch of dead branches in our git repository, and I'd like to clean them up. Ones that were merged (but not deleted at the time) are easy; we can see those in the branch list on Bitbucket. But a lot were abandoned and not deleted, some by people who no longer work here. I want to find and delete those, as nobody else will ever care.- Specifically, I would like to find all branches where the only branch-local commits were from specific people. I can do this one at a time by inspecting the commits on a branch, but I don't want to have to look at them one at a time: I'd like to be able to run a command that will return a list of candidate branches, and then I'll go look at *those* by hand to confirm their state and delete them.
- Is there something I can do, either from Bitbucket or the git command line, to find those branches?
- []()We have a bunch of dead branches in our git repository, and I'd like to clean them up. Ones that were merged (but not deleted at the time) are easy; we can see those in the branch list on Bitbucket. But a lot were abandoned and not deleted, some by people who no longer work here. I want to find and delete those, as nobody else will ever care.
- Specifically, I would like to find all branches where the only branch-local commits were from specific people. I can do this one at a time by inspecting the commits on a branch, but I don't want to have to look at them one at a time: I'd like to be able to run a command that will return a list of candidate branches, and then I'll go look at *those* by hand to confirm their state and delete them.
- Is there something I can do, either from Bitbucket or the git command line, to find those branches?
#1: Initial revision
How can I find git branches where all branch-local commits are from specific people?
We have a bunch of dead branches in our git repository, and I'd like to clean them up. Ones that were merged (but not deleted at the time) are easy; we can see those in the branch list on Bitbucket. But a lot were abandoned and not deleted, some by people who no longer work here. I want to find and delete those, as nobody else will ever care. Specifically, I would like to find all branches where the only branch-local commits were from specific people. I can do this one at a time by inspecting the commits on a branch, but I don't want to have to look at them one at a time: I'd like to be able to run a command that will return a list of candidate branches, and then I'll go look at *those* by hand to confirm their state and delete them. Is there something I can do, either from Bitbucket or the git command line, to find those branches?