Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
Should be avoided secondary discussions or debates on controversial points (please ask a question on meta). Just when is a discussion secondary? I think r~~ used the term "digressive", wh...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
by
meriton
·
2021-04-30T14:37:47Z (almost 3 years ago)
> **Should be avoided** > > * secondary discussions or debates on controversial points (please ask a question on meta). Just when is a discussion secondary? I think r~~ used the term "digressive", which I find to convey the intent better. I get that we don't want to derail comment threads with lengthy tangential debates, in particular while threaded comments don't exist yet. But a thread is only derailed if the discussion is lengthy, so I think we should write that into the rule. Also, digressive discussions might also be about technical points. I therefore propose: > * lengthy digressive discussions (should be moved to a separate question)