Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
Here I used asterisk after Node. Actually, why asterisk used for? What if I don't put any asterisk after Node (Both Node are structure). It's a pointer. A pointer, like its name implies, poin...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
> Here I used asterisk after Node. Actually, why asterisk used for? What if I don't put any asterisk after Node (Both Node are structure). It's a pointer. A pointer, like its name implies, points to an actual object in memory. (More technically, it holds an address to the memory location). In your Node example, it is necessary because using a plain object is impossible. Think of a struct like a box. The box has compartments, which hold the items in it. By necessity, the compartment must be smaller than the box itself. Now, imagine trying to stuff a Node into another Node. This is like trying to stuff a box into a compartment of a box of the same size -- it just doesn't fit. However, if we use a *pointer*, we get around that problem. We slip in a piece of paper into the box that says "the next box is over there", so we don't try to stuff boxes in boxes. > Is `*ptr` and `ptr*` same? It's not. The basic syntax to declare a pointer is `type * var_name`. The most likely confusion you have is which one is the type, and which one is the variable name. In `struct Node * next`, `struct Node` is the type, and `next` is the variable name. In `int *ptr;`, `int` is the type, and `ptr` is the variable name. Note that spaces are completely irrelevant. `int* ptr` is the same as `int *ptr` is the same as `int * ptr`.