Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A How do I communicate with a subproject in qmake?

Options There are three basic channels to choose from Shared build-include (.pri) files CONFIG .qmake.conf and I discuss the practicalities of each below. Shared .pri files Set or add to...

posted 3y ago by dmckee‭  ·  edited 3y ago by dmckee‭

Answer
#3: Post edited by user avatar dmckee‭ · 2021-07-17T00:08:29Z (over 3 years ago)
Fix a markdown error
  • ## Options
  • There are three basic channels to choose from
  • * Shared build-include (`.pri`) files
  • * `CONFIG`
  • * `.qmake.conf`
  • and I discuss the practicalities of each below.
  • ## Shared `.pri` files
  • Set or add to things like `INCLUDEPATH` or `DEFINES` that should affect your whole project in a `.pri file. Then use the qmake `include` function in all the affected `.pro` files.
  • This is my go-to method when I'm coding all the parts of a subdirs project at once. You can also get more selective and build several `.pri` files that each add things to setup parts of the build environment. Then each subproject's `.pro` asks for only what it needs.
  • A useful trick if you don't know if you are going to be a subproject or not is to *check* for a file and read it if it exists
  • ```
  • # Let any super-project modify our build
  • exists(../myproject.pri){
  • include(../myproject.pri)
  • }
  • ```
  • I'm using this for some library code that is being built in-situ by two
  • projects with different needs.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Filenames to be used with `include` either need to be known in advance or you have to use one of these methods to communicate it.
  • ## `CONFIG`
  • Most qmake variables are not shared down the build tree, but this one is
  • special (this distinction also shows up in the presence of the `config()` test function while all other variables have to use `contains()`).
  • Because `CONFIG` is a list you can add anything not already significant to qmake to the it. I suggest using a (more or less) unique prefix or suffix on flags meant for subdirectory builds so that you end up with values like
  • `SOMEPROJECT_SOMEFEATURE`.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Option selections can be set from the command line or the IDE
  • ### Cons:
  • * Potential for name collisions
  • * Users are limited to variations that you foresee
  • * If you don't want to force your users to need to read your `.pro` file
  • you'll have to document the options and what they do.
  • ## `.qmake.conf`
  • I can't find any authoritative documentation, but I believe that qmake looks in the current directory and it's parent (and maybe further up the directory tree?) for a file named this way, and if found includes it in the `.pro` file currently being processed.
  • That makes it a kind of automated version of shared build-include files.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple(?)
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Without good documentation it feels fragile, hard to compose, and unreliable.
  • ## Options
  • There are three basic channels to choose from
  • * Shared build-include (`.pri`) files
  • * `CONFIG`
  • * `.qmake.conf`
  • and I discuss the practicalities of each below.
  • ## Shared `.pri` files
  • Set or add to things like `INCLUDEPATH` or `DEFINES` that should affect your whole project in a `.pri`[]() file. Then use the qmake `include` function in all the affected `.pro` files.
  • This is my go-to method when I'm coding all the parts of a subdirs project at once. You can also get more selective and build several `.pri` files that each add things to setup parts of the build environment. Then each subproject's `.pro` asks for only what it needs.
  • A useful trick if you don't know if you are going to be a subproject or not is to *check* for a file and read it if it exists
  • ```
  • # Let any super-project modify our build
  • exists(../myproject.pri){
  • include(../myproject.pri)
  • }
  • ```
  • I'm using this for some library code that is being built in-situ by two
  • projects with different needs.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Filenames to be used with `include` either need to be known in advance or you have to use one of these methods to communicate it.
  • ## `CONFIG`
  • Most qmake variables are not shared down the build tree, but this one is
  • special (this distinction also shows up in the presence of the `config()` test function while all other variables have to use `contains()`).
  • Because `CONFIG` is a list you can add anything not already significant to qmake to the it. I suggest using a (more or less) unique prefix or suffix on flags meant for subdirectory builds so that you end up with values like
  • `SOMEPROJECT_SOMEFEATURE`.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Option selections can be set from the command line or the IDE
  • ### Cons:
  • * Potential for name collisions
  • * Users are limited to variations that you foresee
  • * If you don't want to force your users to need to read your `.pro` file
  • you'll have to document the options and what they do.
  • ## `.qmake.conf`
  • I can't find any authoritative documentation, but I believe that qmake looks in the current directory and it's parent (and maybe further up the directory tree?) for a file named this way, and if found includes it in the `.pro` file currently being processed.
  • That makes it a kind of automated version of shared build-include files.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple(?)
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Without good documentation it feels fragile, hard to compose, and unreliable.
#2: Post edited by user avatar dmckee‭ · 2021-07-16T15:50:23Z (over 3 years ago)
  • ## Options
  • There are three basic channels to choose from
  • * Shared build-include (`.pri`) files
  • * `CONFIG`
  • * `.qmake.conf`
  • and I discuss the practicalities of each below.
  • ## Shared `.pri` files
  • Set or add to things like `INCLUDEPATH` or `DEFINES` that should affect your whole project in a `.pri file. Then use the qmake `include` function in all the affected `.pro` files.
  • This is my go-to method when I'm coding all the parts of a subdirs project at once. You can also get more selective and build several `.pri` files that each add things to setup parts of the build environment. Then each subproject's `.pro` asks for only what it needs.
  • A useful trick if you don't know if you are going to be a subproject or not is to *check* for a file and read it if it exists
  • ```
  • # Let any super-project modify our build
  • exists(../myproject.pri){
  • include(../myproject.pri)
  • }
  • ```
  • I'm using this for some library code that is being built in-situ by two
  • projects with different needs.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Filenames to be used with `include` either need to be known in advance or you have to use one of these methods to communicate it.
  • ## `CONFIG`
  • Most qmake variables are not shared down the build tree, but this one is
  • special (this distinction also shows up in the presence of the `config()` test function while all other variables have to use `contains()`).
  • Because `CONFIG` is a list you can add anything not already significant to qmake to the it. I suggest using a (more or less) unique prefix or suffix on flags meant for subdirectory builds so that you end up with values like
  • `SOMEPROJECT_SOMEFEATURE`.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Option selections can be set from the command line or the IDE
  • ### Cons:
  • * Potential for name collisions
  • * Users are limited to variations that you foresee
  • * If you don't want to force your users to need to read your `.pro` file
  • you'll have to document the options and what they do.
  • ## `.qmake.conf`
  • This file is automatically treated as part of I can't find any authoritative documentation, but I believe that qmake looks in the current directory and it's parent (and maybe further up the directory tree?) for a file named this way, and if found includes it in the `.pro` file currently being processed.
  • That makes it a kind of automated version of shared build-include files.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple(?)
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Without good documentation it feels fragile, hard to compose, and unreliable.
  • ## Options
  • There are three basic channels to choose from
  • * Shared build-include (`.pri`) files
  • * `CONFIG`
  • * `.qmake.conf`
  • and I discuss the practicalities of each below.
  • ## Shared `.pri` files
  • Set or add to things like `INCLUDEPATH` or `DEFINES` that should affect your whole project in a `.pri file. Then use the qmake `include` function in all the affected `.pro` files.
  • This is my go-to method when I'm coding all the parts of a subdirs project at once. You can also get more selective and build several `.pri` files that each add things to setup parts of the build environment. Then each subproject's `.pro` asks for only what it needs.
  • A useful trick if you don't know if you are going to be a subproject or not is to *check* for a file and read it if it exists
  • ```
  • # Let any super-project modify our build
  • exists(../myproject.pri){
  • include(../myproject.pri)
  • }
  • ```
  • I'm using this for some library code that is being built in-situ by two
  • projects with different needs.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Filenames to be used with `include` either need to be known in advance or you have to use one of these methods to communicate it.
  • ## `CONFIG`
  • Most qmake variables are not shared down the build tree, but this one is
  • special (this distinction also shows up in the presence of the `config()` test function while all other variables have to use `contains()`).
  • Because `CONFIG` is a list you can add anything not already significant to qmake to the it. I suggest using a (more or less) unique prefix or suffix on flags meant for subdirectory builds so that you end up with values like
  • `SOMEPROJECT_SOMEFEATURE`.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Option selections can be set from the command line or the IDE
  • ### Cons:
  • * Potential for name collisions
  • * Users are limited to variations that you foresee
  • * If you don't want to force your users to need to read your `.pro` file
  • you'll have to document the options and what they do.
  • ## `.qmake.conf`
  • I can't find any authoritative documentation, but I believe that qmake looks in the current directory and it's parent (and maybe further up the directory tree?) for a file named this way, and if found includes it in the `.pro` file currently being processed.
  • That makes it a kind of automated version of shared build-include files.
  • ### Pros:
  • * Simple(?)
  • * Flexible
  • ### Cons:
  • * Without good documentation it feels fragile, hard to compose, and unreliable.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar dmckee‭ · 2021-07-16T03:21:39Z (over 3 years ago)
## Options

There are three basic channels to choose from

* Shared build-include (`.pri`) files
* `CONFIG`
* `.qmake.conf`

and I discuss the practicalities of each below.

## Shared `.pri` files

Set or add to things like `INCLUDEPATH` or `DEFINES` that should affect your whole project in a `.pri file. Then use the qmake `include` function in all the affected `.pro` files.

This is my go-to method when I'm coding all the parts of a subdirs project at once. You can also get more selective and build several `.pri` files that each add things to setup parts of the build environment. Then each subproject's `.pro` asks for only what it needs.

A useful trick if you don't know if you are going to be a subproject or not is to *check* for a file and read it if it exists
```
# Let any super-project modify our build
exists(../myproject.pri){
    include(../myproject.pri)
}
```
I'm using this for some library code that is being built in-situ by two
projects with different needs.

### Pros:

* Simple
* Flexible

### Cons:

* Filenames to be used with `include` either need to be known in advance or you have to use one of these methods to communicate it.


## `CONFIG`

Most qmake variables are not shared down the build tree, but this one is
special (this distinction also shows up in the presence of the `config()` test function while all other variables have to use `contains()`).

Because `CONFIG` is a list you can add anything not already significant to qmake to the it. I suggest using a (more or less) unique prefix or suffix on flags meant for subdirectory builds so that you end up with values like
`SOMEPROJECT_SOMEFEATURE`.

### Pros:

* Option selections can be set from the command line or the IDE

### Cons:

* Potential for name collisions
* Users are limited to variations that you foresee
* If you don't want to force your users to need to read your `.pro` file 
you'll have to document the options and what they do.


## `.qmake.conf`

This file is automatically treated as part of I can't find any authoritative documentation, but I believe that qmake looks in the current directory and it's parent (and maybe further up the directory tree?) for a file named this way, and if found includes it in the `.pro` file currently being processed.

That makes it a kind of automated version of shared build-include files.

### Pros:

* Simple(?)
* Flexible

### Cons:

* Without good documentation it feels fragile, hard to compose, and unreliable.