Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

84%
+9 −0
Meta Should we allow questions about software quality assurance?

My personal opinion (I am not speaking for Codidact) is that we named the community "Software Development", not "Programming". Testing, both unit testing done by the developer and functional/perfo...

posted 3y ago by Monica Cellio‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2022-02-04T21:35:45Z (almost 3 years ago)
My personal opinion (I am not speaking for Codidact) is that we named the community "Software Development", not "Programming".  Testing, both unit testing done by the developer and functional/performance/integration testing done (usually) by testers, is part of the software-development process writ large.  I hope that questions about test frameworks, testing strategies, and testing processes would be welcome.  (I would hope the same for at least code-adjacent documentation, like Doxygen, too.)

Further, here's the short description at the top of the Q&A category that was set up when we launched this community:

> General Q&A about programming, scripting, software design & architecture, process, tools, testing, and more.

If this description no longer matches the desires of the community then of course we can adjust it, but it's a sign that at least in our early discussions folks thought testing was in scope.