Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

72%
+6 −1
Q&A How to unittest method that involves contacting remote servers?

Let's say I have this class: class myService { private boolean foo(T arg) { return arg == 42; } public Response bar(U arg) { if(foo(U.field)) { return Response.st...

1 answer  ·  posted 2y ago by klutt‭  ·  last activity 2y ago by meriton‭

#2: Post edited by user avatar klutt‭ · 2022-02-22T11:03:48Z (about 2 years ago)
  • Let's say I have this class:
  • class myService {
  • private boolean foo(T arg) { return arg == 42; }
  • public Response bar(U arg) {
  • if(foo(U.field)) {
  • return Response.status(Response.Status.BAD_REQUEST).build();
  • }
  • // Code that contacts a remote server
  • }
  • }
  • I want to unittest this with Junit. But there are some problems. I'm actually mainly interested in testing `foo()`, but that one is private. I could make it public, but I really don't want to do that just so that the test class can access it.
  • It works fine to test test cases that should fail, which in this case means that `foo` returns true. But in the case that `foo` returns false, we will reach the code that contacts remote servers, and that's not desirable.
  • How should I refactor this so that I can test `foo` via `bar` regardless if `foo` returns true or false?
  • Let's say I have this class:
  • class myService {
  • private boolean foo(T arg) { return arg == 42; }
  • public Response bar(U arg) {
  • if(foo(U.field)) {
  • return Response.status(Response.Status.BAD_REQUEST).build();
  • }
  • // Code that contacts a remote server
  • }
  • }
  • I want to unittest this with Junit. But there are some problems. I'm actually mainly interested in testing `foo()`, but that one is private. I could make it public, but I really don't want to do that just so that the test class can access it. I could also write a wrapper around `bar()` but again, it feels weird to modify the API for this purpose.
  • It works fine to test test cases that should fail, which in this case means that `foo` returns true. But in the case that `foo` returns false, we will reach the code that contacts remote servers, and that's not desirable.
  • How should I refactor this so that I can test `foo` via `bar` regardless if `foo` returns true or false?
#1: Initial revision by user avatar klutt‭ · 2022-02-22T10:58:30Z (about 2 years ago)
How to unittest method that involves contacting remote servers?
Let's say I have this class:

    class myService {
        private boolean foo(T arg) { return arg == 42; }

        public Response bar(U arg) {
            if(foo(U.field)) {
                return Response.status(Response.Status.BAD_REQUEST).build();
            }

            // Code that contacts a remote server
        }
    }

I want to unittest this with Junit. But there are some problems. I'm actually mainly interested in testing `foo()`, but that one is private. I could make it public, but I really don't want to do that just so that the test class can access it. 

It works fine to test test cases that should fail, which in this case means that `foo` returns true. But in the case that `foo` returns false, we will reach the code that contacts remote servers, and that's not desirable. 

How should I refactor this so that I can test `foo` via `bar` regardless if `foo` returns true or false?