Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Vim: how to search for all instances of a string, except for those that are between two specific strings

+10
−0

Using Vim, I am trying to search for all instances of a specific string, except for those that fall somewhere in between two other specific strings.

For example, I want to determine all instances of bird, except for those that fall somewhere between abc and xyz. So in the text below, a successful command would find only the 1st and 3rd instances of bird on line 1, and only the 1st instance of bird on line 2:

bird ant abc cow bird xyz cat bird
cat dog fish bird abc bird horse xyz

my best efforts:

This search seems to find all instances of bird that do not have xyz somewhere after them:

/bird\(.*xyz\)\@!

This search seems to find all instances of bird that do not have abc somewhere before them (a similar example is shown in :help \@<!)

/\(abc.*\)\@<!bird

But naively trying to combine these two patterns does not work:

/\(abc.*\)\@<!bird\(.*xyz\)\@!
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

2 answers

+9
−0

Alternating between the two patterns seems to work!

\(abc.*\)\@<!bird\|bird\(.*xyz\)\@!

As a bonus, you can enable the very magic mode with \v to avoid backslashes! The resulting expression is equivalent but easier to type.

\v(abc.*)@<!bird|bird(.*xyz)@!

For reference: :help /bar and :help \v.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+8
−0

As @Quasímodo‭ has shown, the search pattern \(abc.*\)\@<!bird\|bird\(.*xyz\)\@! solves your problem. But, why does it work, and why does your original approach not work?

What you want to achieve is to find all occurrences of "bird" for which the following holds:

"bird" if not between "abc" and "xyz"

Which can be re-phrased as

"bird" if not ((preceded by "abc") and (followed by "xyz"))

Or, using De Morgan's law:

"bird" if ((not preceded by "abc") or (not followed by "xyz"))
<==> (bird if not preceded by "abc") or (bird if not followed by "xyz")

This is why @Quasímodo‭'s answer works.

Your search pattern /\(abc.*\)\@<!bird\(.*xyz\)\@!, however, has the following meaning:

bird, if ((not preceded by "abc") AND (not followed by "xyz"))

In other words, an occurrence of "bird" will be ignored if there is a preceding "abc" or a following "xyz". You will see this when trying your original expression on the following line:

foo bird bar

This occurrence of bird will be found.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »