Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
It seems I'm missing something since the answer should really be obvious. Nonetheless, I'll answer what you appear to be asking to get the obvious case out of the way. The method has already "f...
Answer
#2: Post edited
by
Olin Lathrop
·
2022-11-07T13:10:13Z (over 1 year ago)
- The method has already "fallen apart" due to the extra axis of 2D. In 1D it's nice and simple. You grab N behind and N in front, all nicely sequential.
- Note how your diagram has lines that break the flow and start again at a new Y coordinate. 3D is just an extension of that.
- In 2D, you already know how to load a row. You go back and load multiple rows when the Y dimension is added. In 3D, you remember from the 2D case how to load a layer. You go back and load multiple layers when the Z dimension is added.
- It seems I'm missing something since the answer should really be obvious. Nonetheless, I'll answer what you appear to be asking to get the obvious case out of the way.
- <hr>
- The method has already "fallen apart" due to the extra axis of 2D. In 1D it's nice and simple. You grab N behind and N in front, all nicely sequential.
- Note how your diagram has lines that break the flow and start again at a new Y coordinate. 3D is just an extension of that.
- In 2D, you already know how to load a row. You go back and load multiple rows when the Y dimension is added. In 3D, you remember from the 2D case how to load a layer. You go back and load multiple layers when the Z dimension is added.
#1: Initial revision
by
Olin Lathrop
·
2022-11-07T13:07:56Z (over 1 year ago)
The method has already "fallen apart" due to the extra axis of 2D. In 1D it's nice and simple. You grab N behind and N in front, all nicely sequential. Note how your diagram has lines that break the flow and start again at a new Y coordinate. 3D is just an extension of that. In 2D, you already know how to load a row. You go back and load multiple rows when the Y dimension is added. In 3D, you remember from the 2D case how to load a layer. You go back and load multiple layers when the Z dimension is added.