Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

84%
+9 −0
Q&A Why are commas not needed for modulo string formatting when printing?

It is, as you said, an operator so it doesn't make any sense to place a comma somewhere between the operator and the two operands. The first operand is the template string, and the second operand ...

posted 2y ago by __blackjack__‭  ·  edited 2y ago by __blackjack__‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar __blackjack__‭ · 2023-02-27T16:05:49Z (almost 2 years ago)
  • It is, as you said, an *operator* so it doesn't make any sense to place a comma somewhere between the operator and the two operands. The first operand is the template string, and the second operand is the tuple with the values to format into the template string. The `print()` function gets *one* argument — the result of the formatting operation.
  • Maybe it helps to bind the both operands to names, so the expression becomes a bit simpler:
  • ```python
  • animal = "giraffe"
  • age = 25
  • template = "A %s can live up to %d years"
  • values = (animal, age)
  • print(template % values)
  • ```
  • The `%` operator is syntactically no different than other binary operators like `+` or `/` and so on.
  • It is, as you said, an *operator* so it doesn't make any sense to place a comma somewhere between the operator and the two operands. The first operand is the template string, and the second operand is the tuple with the values to format into the template string. The `print()` function gets *one* argument — the result of the formatting operation.
  • Maybe it helps to bind both operands to names, so the expression becomes a bit simpler:
  • ```python
  • animal = "giraffe"
  • age = 25
  • template = "A %s can live up to %d years"
  • values = (animal, age)
  • print(template % values)
  • ```
  • The `%` operator is syntactically no different than other binary operators like `+` or `/` and so on.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar __blackjack__‭ · 2023-02-27T16:05:16Z (almost 2 years ago)
It is, as you said, an *operator* so it doesn't make any sense to place a comma somewhere between the operator and the two operands.  The first operand is the template string, and the second operand is the tuple with the values to format into the template string.  The `print()` function gets *one* argument — the result of the formatting operation.

Maybe it helps to bind the both operands to names, so the expression becomes a bit simpler:
```python
animal = "giraffe"
age = 25
template = "A %s can live up to %d years"
values = (animal, age)
print(template % values)
```

The `%` operator is syntactically no different than other binary operators like `+` or `/` and so on.