Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents. When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual Fi...
Answer
#7: Post edited
by
Passer By
·
2023-06-09T20:49:02Z (over 1 year ago)
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There are no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these differences are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- The key insight is that individuals chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There are no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these differences are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
#6: Post edited
by
Passer By
·
2023-06-09T20:48:00Z (over 1 year ago)
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these differences are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There are no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these differences are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
#5: Post edited
by
Passer By
·
2023-06-09T20:47:06Z (over 1 year ago)
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these differences are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these differences are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
#4: Post edited
by
Passer By
·
2023-06-09T20:44:59Z (over 1 year ago)
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these changes are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these differences are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
#3: Post edited
by
Passer By
·
2023-06-09T20:44:35Z (over 1 year ago)
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI changes, and I don't know whatever is justifying these changes are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI differences, and I don't know whatever is justifying these changes are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
#2: Post edited
by
Passer By
·
2023-06-09T20:42:33Z (over 1 year ago)
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
When a ship starts going down, there's only three course of action for every individual- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI changes, and I don't know whatever is justifying these changes are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
- In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents.
- When a ship starts going down, there's only three courses of action for every individual
- 1. Fix it
- 2. Abandon it
- 3. Stick with it
- and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing:
- _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_.
- There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming.
- This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate.
- ---
- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up.
- A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI changes, and I don't know whatever is justifying these changes are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site".
- Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.
#1: Initial revision
by
Passer By
·
2023-06-09T20:42:09Z (over 1 year ago)
In light of another fiesta on a "competitor site", I poked my head in here again. Here's my twocents. When a ship starts going down, there's only three course of action for every individual 1. Fix it 2. Abandon it 3. Stick with it and the key is that individual chooses the option that sounds the best to them, personally. Given that the ship is going down rather fast at the moment, you'd think there's plenty of motivation to abandon ship. But it's not, here's the thing: _I can't get my daily Q&A fix here_. There's no questions, what am I going to answer? If I abandon ship, I'd be swimming. This is not entirely a chicken and egg problem. There's no way you can answer a non-existent question. You can, however, ask a question even if you only get subpar answers. You have to get the questions in first. The answerers are easy to, shall we say, entice in the current climate. --- Aside from that, there's just a lot of UI/UX pains that adds up. A lot of workflow habits are broken by UI changes, and I don't know whatever is justifying these changes are worth it. I suggest a very loose goal of breaking the least amount of workflow habits for the UI carried over from the (ahem) "competitor site". Exhibit A: I can't resize this answer box. And I'm triggered.