Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

81%
+7 −0
Meta Should I delete my trivial, lack-of-research question?

I agree with Dirk Herrmann‭'s answer about this: What if a question is beginner level? I would say: Someone should answer it. Some of the beginner level questions on stackoverflow have rece...

posted 11mo ago by Alexei‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Alexei‭ · 2023-06-16T14:30:06Z (11 months ago)
I agree with [Dirk Herrmann‭'s answer](https://software.codidact.com/posts/284979/286152#answer-286152) about this:

 > What if a question is beginner level? I would say: Someone should answer it.

 > Some of the beginner level questions on stackoverflow have received answers that explain things in wonderful ways.

While your question seems trivial for a seasoned Java developer, the issue is not obvious for beginners.

It happens that I am a .NET developer that toyed just a little with a Maven project some months ago. In .NET World (Visual Studio, Rider, etc.), dependencies are managed in a more automatic way and when adding a packet, all its dependencies are automatically added to the project. It was very strange when in Java it is pretty easy to miss some dependencies required by your dependencies. Not to mention that I had to often check the pom.xml file due to dependency-related errors.

My suggestion is to keep the question as it might help other folks in the future.