Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
SQL is as good as it gets, generally speaking. The best engine for a small project is SQLite. If you need more, the next step is Postgres. Postgres is very capable and it's unlikely that you'll nee...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
SQL is as good as it gets, generally speaking. The best engine for a small project is SQLite. If you need more, the next step is Postgres. Postgres is very capable and it's unlikely that you'll *need* more even as a medium sized company. But it sounds like you're asking about small personal projects. "State of the art" that goes beyond SQL/Postgres is usually about scalability and division of labor. These are concerns relevant to large companies (Facebook, Netflix, ...) and not for personal projects. By using these cutting edge DBs, you will be accepting compromises that make your life more difficult, and gaining benefits that don't apply to you. As stated elsewhere, you can read/write from a SQL DB with Pandas, and many DB connectors support some kind of `.to_pandas` method. However, this won't save you form learning SQL, since you'll still have to pass the queries to fetch and upsert the data. Pandas also has a looser typing system than the typical DB, so you might often run into annoying type mismatch/conversion bugs there. Instead of a DB, you can use pandas to read/write some simple file format, like CSV or Parquet. I would recommend CSV, it's easy to work with using other tools as well. If you want something nested, then JSON is a good start. You should really just learn SQL. Pandas at its heart is a crude reimplementation of things SQL has perfected half a century ago.