Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Code Reviews Meta
Meta
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

88%
+13 −0
Meta How can we grow this community?

Search engine optimization? I thought this goes without saying, but apparently we aren't doing too well there for some reason. The other day I was having a discussion with someone at SO regarding...

posted 1y ago by Lundin‭  ·  edited 1y ago by Lundin‭

Answer
#3: Post edited by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-09-15T11:28:32Z (about 1 year ago)
  • Search engine optimization?
  • ---
  • I thought this goes without saying, but apparently we aren't doing too well there for some reason.
  • The other day I was having a discussion with someone at SO regarding how hard it was to find specific information about anything. As an example I used a topic which I knew there was no good "canonical" for at SO, which had once resulted in me writing one on Codidact instead.
  • The topic was _endianness_, a common programming term and the question was simply "What is endianness?" or more specifically "What is CPU endianness?" I have written a Codidact post here with the title [What is CPU endianness?](https://software.codidact.com/posts/280640) and with a tag "endianness".
  • Using either that very title in Google, or just typing "what is endianess" results in just a few decent hits, with Wikipedia rightly being the #1 hit. Then follows a flood of misc tutorial sites of diverse or unknown reputation, as well as technical articles and the like. Lots of them probably didn't make any particular effort to end up in Google ranks. And yet Codidact is nowhere to be found.
  • The term "endianness" should be a good example to use for a search term, because it is completely unambiguous and only appears in a software engineering context.
  • I have to Google `"What is CPU endianness?"` with the exact title within citation marks to get Codidact appear at all, then as the #1 hit (the other hits being SO posts by me where I link to the Codidact post, as well as some SO scraper site).
  • This can't be right.
  • Search engine optimization?
  • ---
  • I thought this goes without saying, but apparently we aren't doing too well there for some reason.
  • The other day I was having a discussion with someone at SO regarding how hard it was to find specific information about anything on SO, even when using Google for the search. As an example I used a topic which I knew there was no good "canonical" for at SO, which had once resulted in me writing one on Codidact instead.
  • The topic was _endianness_, a common programming term and the question was simply "What is endianness?" or more specifically "What is CPU endianness?" I have written a Codidact post here with the title [What is CPU endianness?](https://software.codidact.com/posts/280640) and with a tag "endianness".
  • Using either that very title in Google, or just typing "what is endianess" results in just a few decent hits, with Wikipedia rightly being the #1 hit. Then follows a flood of misc tutorial sites of diverse or unknown reputation, as well as technical articles and the like. Lots of them probably didn't make any particular effort to end up in Google ranks. And yet Codidact is nowhere to be found.
  • The term "endianness" should be a good example to use for a search term, because it is completely unambiguous and only appears in a software engineering context.
  • I have to Google `"What is CPU endianness?"` with the exact title within citation marks to get Codidact appear at all, then as the #1 hit (the other hits being SO posts by me where I link to the Codidact post, as well as some SO scraper site).
  • This can't be right.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-09-15T11:27:54Z (about 1 year ago)
  • Search engine optimization? I thought this goes without saying, but apparently we aren't doing too well there for some reason.
  • The other day I was having a discussion with someone at SO regarding how hard it was to find specific information about anything. As an example I used a topic which I knew there was no good "canonical" for at SO, which had once resulted in me writing one on Codidact instead.
  • The topic was _endianness_, a common programming term and the question was simply "What is endianness?" or more specifically "What is CPU endianness?" I have written a Codidact post here with the title [What is CPU endianness?](https://software.codidact.com/posts/280640) and with a tag "endianness".
  • Using either that very title in Google, or just typing "what is endianess" results in just a few decent hits, with Wikipedia rightly being the #1 hit. Then follows a flood of misc tutorial sites of diverse or unknown reputation, as well as technical articles and the like. Lots of them probably didn't make any particular effort to end up in Google ranks. And yet Codidact is nowhere to be found.
  • The term "endianness" should be a good example to use for a search term, because it is completely unambiguous and only appears in a software engineering context.
  • I have to Google `"What is CPU endianness?"` with the exact title within citation marks to get Codidact appear at all, then as the #1 hit (the other hits being SO posts by me where I link to the Codidact post, as well as some SO scraper site).
  • This can't be right.
  • Search engine optimization?
  • ---
  • I thought this goes without saying, but apparently we aren't doing too well there for some reason.
  • The other day I was having a discussion with someone at SO regarding how hard it was to find specific information about anything. As an example I used a topic which I knew there was no good "canonical" for at SO, which had once resulted in me writing one on Codidact instead.
  • The topic was _endianness_, a common programming term and the question was simply "What is endianness?" or more specifically "What is CPU endianness?" I have written a Codidact post here with the title [What is CPU endianness?](https://software.codidact.com/posts/280640) and with a tag "endianness".
  • Using either that very title in Google, or just typing "what is endianess" results in just a few decent hits, with Wikipedia rightly being the #1 hit. Then follows a flood of misc tutorial sites of diverse or unknown reputation, as well as technical articles and the like. Lots of them probably didn't make any particular effort to end up in Google ranks. And yet Codidact is nowhere to be found.
  • The term "endianness" should be a good example to use for a search term, because it is completely unambiguous and only appears in a software engineering context.
  • I have to Google `"What is CPU endianness?"` with the exact title within citation marks to get Codidact appear at all, then as the #1 hit (the other hits being SO posts by me where I link to the Codidact post, as well as some SO scraper site).
  • This can't be right.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-09-15T11:26:30Z (about 1 year ago) 
Search engine optimization? I thought this goes without saying, but apparently we aren't doing too well there for some reason.

The other day I was having a discussion with someone at SO regarding how hard it was to find specific information about anything. As an example I used a topic which I knew there was no good "canonical" for at SO, which had once resulted in me writing one on Codidact instead.

The topic was _endianness_, a common programming term and the question was simply "What is endianness?" or more specifically "What is CPU endianness?" I have written a Codidact post here with the title [What is CPU endianness?](https://software.codidact.com/posts/280640) and with a tag "endianness". 

Using either that very title in Google, or just typing "what is endianess" results in just a few decent hits, with Wikipedia rightly being the #1 hit. Then follows a flood of misc tutorial sites of diverse or unknown reputation, as well as technical articles and the like. Lots of them probably didn't make any particular effort to end up in Google ranks. And yet Codidact is nowhere to be found.

The term "endianness" should be a good example to use for a search term, because it is completely unambiguous and only appears in a software engineering context.

I have to Google `"What is CPU endianness?"` with the exact title within citation marks to get Codidact appear at all, then as the #1 hit (the other hits being SO posts by me where I link to the Codidact post, as well as some SO scraper site).

This can't be right.