Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Alternatives to `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` for queries that won't complete

Note: I have limited experience with PostgreSQL, but extensive experience working with SQL Server, so not everything below might apply to PostgreSQL. I have a large and complex PostgreSQL query ...

posted 8mo ago by Alexei‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Alexei‭ · 2023-09-19T06:18:19Z (8 months ago)
Note: I have limited experience with PostgreSQL, but extensive experience working with SQL Server, so not everything below might apply to PostgreSQL.


 > I have a large and complex PostgreSQL query that I would like to make faster. (..) When run, it does not complete in any reasonable amount of time 

I would assume we are talking about a SELECT statement. One quick change to try would be using a LIMIT and see if the query ends for a small amount of returned rows. 

However, I think that the real issue is that the query became large and complex. This should be broken into multiple statements with the help of temporary tables. This can also be encapsulated in [a stored procedure](https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/274735/unable-to-save-a-stored-procedure-which-contains-a-temporary-table-creation-and).

The code structure can look like the following:

- create the temporary table (i.e. empty, contains the output structure)
- minimally populate the temporary table, for example having only a few columns populated with values (the rest remain NULL)
- add UPDATE statements to deal with the rest of the columns. Define as many UPDATEs as are needed to have a good enough performance

Another advantage of this approach is readability (smaller queries) and maintainability (e.g. easier to change when a column is added as this affects a small query).

Other things to consider:

- **historical data** - if the query deals with historical data aggregates, these can be precomputed in some persisted tables
- **indexes** - consider adding [covering indexes](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/indexes-index-only-scans.html)