Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

What is a "security protocol"? Is it the same as a "cryptographic protocol"?

+5
−0

What is the difference (if any) between a "security protocol" and a "cryptographic protocol"? Or are they synonyms?

Some of the references I've seen -- (a), (b), (c), (d), etc. -- mention both "security protocol" and "cryptographic protocol" with no clear distinction between them.

Other articles -- (e) (f), etc. -- seem to imply that (some? all?) security protocols use cryptographic protocols, but leave me without a clear understanding of the distinction.

History

0 comment threads

1 answer

+2
−0

I would say there isn't any meaningful distinction. I mean, heck, Wikipedia itself, in the article you linked to, just redirects "security protocol" to "cryptographic protocol", it considers them to be the same thing. That's pretty much true in the world of computing.

If we just look at the terms themselves, the obvious implication is "a cryptographic protocol is a security protocol, implemented with cryptography, and a security protocol is a protocol that provides security, but doesn't necessarily use cryptography". The US system of classified documentation is a decent example, there's all kinds of written protocols about what kinds of information should be classified at what levels (Confidential, Secret, Top Secret), how to label such documents, store them, dispose of them, transfer them between parties, etc. All of that is focused around physical human interactions, but could definitely be described as "security protocols" I.E. "rules and procedures for doing things in a secure manner".

Within the world of computing, security does pretty much all come down to cryptography, so just about anything you could describe as a "security protocol" probably can also be described as a "cryptographic protocol", on account of being fundamentally built on some form of cryptography.

History

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »