Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A Trouble understanding java lambdas and generics

Of course, everyone thinks to understand lambdas and generics. I was one of those until recently. Look at my code: package debug; import java.util.function.Function; public class Understand...

1 answer  ·  posted 11mo ago by watchmaker‭  ·  last activity 11mo ago by r~~‭

Question java
#2: Post edited by user avatar ArtOfCode‭ · 2025-10-13T15:18:56Z (11 months ago)
Format code
  • Of course, everyone *thinks* to understand lambdas and generics. I was one of those until recently.
  • Look at my code:
  • >
  • package debug;
  • import java.util.function.Function;
  • public class UnderstandingGenerix {
  • public static void main(String[] args) {
  • {
  • Function<?, ?> code = (String O) -> {
  • System.out.println("todo" + O);
  • return Double.valueOf(1.5);
  • };
  • // Object x = code.apply("xxx"); // compile error
  • // Object x = code.apply((Object) "xxx"); // compile error
  • // Double x = code.apply("xxx"); // compile error
  • }
  • {
  • Function<Object, Object> code = (O) -> {
  • System.out.println("todo" + O);
  • return Double.valueOf(1.5);
  • };
  • Object x = code.apply("xxx");
  • x = code.apply((Object) "xxx");
  • Double xx = (Double) code.apply("xxx");
  • }
  • {
  • Function code = (O) -> {
  • System.out.println("todo" + O);
  • return 1.5;
  • };
  • Object x = code.apply("xxx");
  • x = code.apply((Object) "xxx");
  • Double xx = (Double) code.apply("xxx");
  • }
  • }
  • }
  • (Ooops, why the dangling brace?)
  • From the net, the question mark is a "wildcard" matching *everything* (except primitive types). So "?" and "Object" should be equivalent.
  • What part did I miss?
  • Of course, everyone *thinks* to understand lambdas and generics. I was one of those until recently.
  • Look at my code:
  • ```java
  • package debug;
  • import java.util.function.Function;
  • public class UnderstandingGenerix {
  • public static void main(String[] args) {
  • {
  • Function<?, ?> code = (String O) -> {
  • System.out.println("todo" + O);
  • return Double.valueOf(1.5);
  • };
  • // Object x = code.apply("xxx"); // compile error
  • // Object x = code.apply((Object) "xxx"); // compile error
  • // Double x = code.apply("xxx"); // compile error
  • }
  • {
  • Function<Object, Object> code = (O) -> {
  • System.out.println("todo" + O);
  • return Double.valueOf(1.5);
  • };
  • Object x = code.apply("xxx");
  • x = code.apply((Object) "xxx");
  • Double xx = (Double) code.apply("xxx");
  • }
  • {
  • Function code = (O) -> {
  • System.out.println("todo" + O);
  • return 1.5;
  • };
  • Object x = code.apply("xxx");
  • x = code.apply((Object) "xxx");
  • Double xx = (Double) code.apply("xxx");
  • }
  • }
  • }
  • ```
  • From the net, the question mark is a "wildcard" matching *everything* (except primitive types). So "?" and "Object" should be equivalent.
  • What part did I miss?
#1: Initial revision by user avatar watchmaker‭ · 2025-10-13T13:44:59Z (11 months ago)
Trouble understanding java lambdas and generics
Of course, everyone *thinks* to understand lambdas and generics. I was one of those until recently.

Look at my code:

 > 
package debug;

import java.util.function.Function;

public class UnderstandingGenerix {

	public static void main(String[] args) {

		{
			Function<?, ?> code = (String O) -> {
				System.out.println("todo" + O);
				return Double.valueOf(1.5);
			};
			// Object x = code.apply("xxx"); // compile error
			// Object x = code.apply((Object) "xxx"); // compile error
			// Double x = code.apply("xxx"); // compile error
		}
		{
			Function<Object, Object> code = (O) -> {
				System.out.println("todo" + O);
				return Double.valueOf(1.5);
			};
			Object x = code.apply("xxx");
			x = code.apply((Object) "xxx");
			Double xx = (Double) code.apply("xxx");
		}
		{
			Function code = (O) -> {
				System.out.println("todo" + O);
				return 1.5;
			};
			Object x = code.apply("xxx");
			x = code.apply((Object) "xxx");
			Double xx = (Double) code.apply("xxx");
		}

	}
}

(Ooops, why the dangling brace?)

From the net, the question mark is a "wildcard" matching *everything* (except primitive types). So "?" and "Object" should be equivalent.

What part did I miss?