Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A Macro to verify that an expression has no side effects at compile time

A function is the obvious solution since it only comes with one evaluation per argument before the function is called. If the only rationale for using macros over functions is to avoid casts, then...

posted 8mo ago by Lundin‭  ·  edited 8mo ago by Lundin‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2026-01-15T13:30:28Z (8 months ago)
  • If the only rationale for using macros over functions is to avoid casts, then just make the macro a wrapper macro for the function calls, similar to how a C standard lib will have to implement _QVoid_ and _QChar_ fictional types in C23.
  • Assuming we do not allow implicit `void` pointer conversions (for the same reason as we don't allow casts - type safety), then:
  • ```c
  • #include <string.h>
  • char* strnul (char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • const char* strnulc (const char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • #define strnul(s) \
  • _Generic((s), \
  • char*: strnul, \
  • const char*: strnulc)(s)
  • ```
  • If `void` pointers should be allowed then simply add `void*: strnul` to `_Generic` (and one for `const void*` too). The implicit conversion to `char*` also means we can do standard-compliant pointer arithmetic even if we started out with `void*`.
  • Full code with some test examples:
  • ```c
  • #include <string.h>
  • #include <stdio.h>
  • char* strnul (char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • const char* strnulc (const char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • #define strnul(s) \
  • _Generic((s), \
  • char*: strnul, \
  • const char*: strnulc)(s)
  • int main()
  • {
  • char str[] = "hello";
  • const char* strc = str;
  • printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(str) - str);
  • printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(strc) - strc);
  • printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(str+2) - str);
  • }
  • ```
  • A function is the obvious solution since it only comes with one evaluation per argument before the function is called.
  • If the only rationale for using macros over functions is to avoid casts, then just make the macro a wrapper macro for the function calls, similar to how a C standard lib will have to implement _QVoid_ and _QChar_ fictional types in C23.
  • Assuming we do not allow implicit `void` pointer conversions (for the same reason as we don't allow casts - type safety), then:
  • ```c
  • #include <string.h>
  • char* strnul (char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • const char* strnulc (const char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • #define strnul(s) \
  • _Generic((s), \
  • char*: strnul, \
  • const char*: strnulc)(s)
  • ```
  • If `void` pointers should be allowed then simply add `void*: strnul` to `_Generic` (and one for `const void*` too). The implicit conversion to `char*` also means we can do standard-compliant pointer arithmetic even if we started out with `void*`.
  • Full code with some test examples:
  • ```c
  • #include <string.h>
  • #include <stdio.h>
  • char* strnul (char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • const char* strnulc (const char* s)
  • {
  • return (s + strlen(s));
  • }
  • #define strnul(s) \
  • _Generic((s), \
  • char*: strnul, \
  • const char*: strnulc)(s)
  • int main()
  • {
  • char str[] = "hello";
  • const char* strc = str;
  • printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(str) - str);
  • printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(strc) - strc);
  • printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(str+2) - str);
  • }
  • ```
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2026-01-13T15:08:41Z (8 months ago)
If the only rationale for using macros over functions is to avoid casts, then just make the macro a wrapper macro for the function calls, similar to how a C standard lib will have to implement _QVoid_ and _QChar_ fictional types in C23.

Assuming we do not allow implicit `void` pointer conversions (for the same reason as we don't allow casts - type safety), then:

```c
#include <string.h>

char* strnul (char* s)
{
  return (s + strlen(s));
}

const char* strnulc (const char* s)
{
  return (s + strlen(s));
}

#define strnul(s)                   \
  _Generic((s),                     \
           char*:       strnul,     \
           const char*: strnulc)(s)
```

If `void` pointers should be allowed then simply add `void*: strnul` to `_Generic` (and one for `const void*` too). The implicit conversion to `char*` also means we can do standard-compliant pointer arithmetic even if we started out with `void*`.

Full code with some test examples:

```c
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>

char* strnul (char* s)
{
  return (s + strlen(s));
}

const char* strnulc (const char* s)
{
  return (s + strlen(s));
}

#define strnul(s)                   \
  _Generic((s),                     \
           char*:       strnul,     \
           const char*: strnulc)(s)

int main()
{
  char str[] = "hello";
  const char* strc = str;

  printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(str)   - str);
  printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(strc)  - strc);
  printf("Pos: %td\n", strnul(str+2) - str);
}
```