Post History

Asking the last five or so questions on SO (I am new here), I felt pretty much the same as you do. I've put a lot of effort in illustrating the problem and ask a concrete question.
While others confirmed they were legit questions, they received downvotes without explanation, and as one commenter pointed out:

 > Eh, the replies are mostly about side stuff rather than what you're asking about.

So I asked my local Gemma 4 and got a good, well-balanced answer.

I also asked Gemma your question and the final point is:

 > The friction you feel is real, and it is a sign that these communities need to evolve—perhaps by becoming less about "fixing syntax" and more about "discussing architecture and nuance"—to remain relevant in the age of AI.

Or as ArtOfCode put it:

 > For Q&A communities like this, perhaps that means a pivot away from asking simple questions looking for help debugging code, and towards asking complex questions looking for ideas that only humans can generate.

I have actually become unsure about "asking complex questions looking for ideas" as I've received feedback like "too broad; inviting for opinionated answers" and close votes when I tried that on SO.