Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Alexei
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #287970 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287940 |
Post edited: Shortened the title |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287940 |
Post edited: split in paragraphs for better readability |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287931 |
I have updated the [on-topic list](https://software.codidact.com/help/on-topic) based on your suggestions. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278625 |
Post edited: added information about SEO |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287932 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287918 |
Oh, sorry. Somehow I forgot to mention the SE ecosystem which has a dedicated community for Webmasters and the SEO-related questions are split (the programming ones can be asked on SO while the others on the Webmasters community). I have fixed my post. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287918 |
Post edited: added missing information |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287918 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Should we allow SEO related questions? We have recently received a search engine optimization (SEO) question. Our scope currently does not explicitly include or exclude such questions, so I thought we should clarify this. Possible options: - allow only programming-related SEO questions (e.g., ensuring website compatibility with d... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287914 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287914 |
Post edited: title is a question |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287914 |
Post edited: used example.com instead of the actual blog |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287903 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287905 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287856 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287856 |
Post edited: added relevant tags |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287851 |
Post edited: minor title fix + added tag |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287814 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287814 |
Post edited: added back tags |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287845 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287818 |
Thanks for the code review. My initial code was a complete mess. I have applied your second suggestion. Indeed I also favor composition over inheritance (which is also favored due to using DI basically everywhere except for some infrastructure code). (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287804 |
Post edited: added rewritten code based on review |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287783 |
@#53549 I am wondering if it wouldn't be easier to read the registry key using [winreg](https://docs.python.org/3/library/winreg.html) instead of doing it indirectly using Powershell. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287807 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287799 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287785 |
Did you check the EventViewer? I expect for IIS to log something there when a worker is crashing. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287783 |
@ghost-in-the-zsh Sorry about that. I didn't notice the Python tag. I have rolled back to your last version until we found a way to make it work when calling it from Python. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287783 |
Post edited: rolled back to previous version because there are issues running it in Python |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287783 |
Post edited: added info for Windows 11 |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287783 |
@#53549 AFAIK, all Windows versions after Windows 7 include a PS installed. This is confirmed by [this article](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/learn/ps101/01-getting-started?view=powershell-7.3). No need for enterprise, I have mentioned it because it was the OS I was using for... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287804 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Health checks with caching in ASP.NET Core Context I noticed that an application was flooding the database with simple SELECTs. The investigation revealed some bugs in the health check which theoretically implemented caching (to avoid querying external sources too often), but it was not working properly. The application health check in... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287782 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287783 |
Post edited: added information about Windows 10 |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287754 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287697 |
Post edited: fixed the code |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287682 |
I have closed this question because it is basically a typo. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287682 | Question closed | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287659 | Nominated for promotion | — | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287659 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287660 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: EF-core Find method doesn't include other entities What you want would be called `DbSet<>.Find()` combined with eager loading of the related entities. According to the docs, eager loading is not mentioned and its sole purpose is to easily get an entity based on its type and keys: > Finds an entity with the given primary key values. If an entity w... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287630 | Nominated for promotion | — | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287635 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Deciding if a concept can be materialized to a tag Note: this is inspired by the comments on this post and especially this one which mentions: > We have tags for languages because people have interest or expertise in languages; likewise frameworks, design patterns, etc. Who is an ‘interface’ enthusiast? This discussion made me question the way... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287612 | Nominated for promotion | — | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287602 | Nominated for promotion | — | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #287616 |
Indeed, my solution is a poor man's solution to configuration management, and using a dedicated solution such as Consul is better. I have chosen this following my more ops-inclined colleagues' advice, but it is not set in stone and we can transition to the modern way of doing it. Thanks. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #287612 |
Post edited: added drawing tool reference |
— | over 2 years ago |