Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Alexeiâ€
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edit | Post #286480 | Nominated for promotion | — | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286440 |
Offtopic/inflammatory comments removed (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286444 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Question | — |
Measuring the impact of using exceptions instead of return values in an ASP.NET Core application Context This Q&A from SO suggests that throwing exceptions is incredibly expensive when compared to returning values (return codes): > that with return codes instead of exceptions the same program runs less than one millisecond, which means exceptions are at least 30,000 times slower than retu... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286440 |
Post edited: added relevant tags + minor fixes |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286405 | Nominated for promotion | — | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277428 |
Post edited: added another attempt |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #277428 |
Post edited: removed app name |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286390 |
Strangely, we had two tags with the exact same name, so I have merged them. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286390 |
Post edited: merged the tags, so this issue is solved |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286372 |
Post edited: Replaced the title to match what is actually being asked |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286306 |
I closed the question because it is not clear what it is being asked. The title suggests a way to remove the pseudo elements, but a previous comment actually mentions removing regular text inside a DOM element. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286306 | Question closed | — | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #285801 |
Since the solution was to use the correct type of parenthesis, it is not particularly helpful for future readers. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #285801 | Question closed | — | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286353 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286345 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286349 |
Post edited: added relevant tags |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #282685 | Question closed | — | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286306 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286306 |
I think it makes sense to understand how the pseudo-elements are actually creating the trouble in your case and why you want them removed. I am not very knowledgeable in CSS, but I guess that such brute-force approaches might seriously mess the layout (i.e. the pseudo-elements are there for a reason)... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286307 |
Post edited: fixed the attribution link |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286304 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286302 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286276 | Question closed | — | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286276 |
This question is not on-topic on Software Development. Please use the Power User site. Be sure to include any relevant details (what have you tried, error messages). (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286275 | Question closed | — | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286275 |
This question is not on-topic on Software Development. Please use the [Power User site](https://powerusers.codidact.com/). Be sure to include any relevant details (what have you tried, error messages). (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286272 |
Thanks for letting us know about the underlying cause of your issue. Since you are still not happy with the solution and have another question, can you please post it separately? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286262 |
Post edited: added minor note |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286262 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
Question | — |
What version of runtime environment does a .NET 5 application actually needs? Our team deals with a legacy application that relies on a rather old deployment process and infrastructure: - we deploy the application on an environment very similar to the production called Clone. Clone is a Windows Server that has (among other versions) a version of .NET 5.0.x (e.g. .NET 5.0.16... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286256 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286196 | Nominated for promotion | — | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286219 |
Post edited: removed non-applicable tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286210 |
Just a thought. I think imask complains because it is not the only managing input's value (what it displays), since NgbDatePicker is also trying to change it following date selection. Why not use [NgbDatePicker's](https://ng-bootstrap.github.io/#/components/datepicker/overview) formatting options ins... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286219 |
Actually, it is just something I have noticed and that needs to be taken into account when looking for a solution. It makes things more complicated when compared to all nodes being in DOM, but hidden. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286219 |
When clicking on a parent node, the child nodes are lazy-loaded (they do not exist in the DOM).
Initial state
```
<div class="CategoryTreeChildren" style="display:none"></div>
```
After clicking (abbreviated):
```
<div class="CategoryTreeChildren" style="">
<div class="CategoryTree... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286216 |
Can you please also provide the HTML / the way it is built dynamically? Currently, the relationship between nodes and their children is not clear and it is needed to be able to go through the descendants and uncollapse through clicking. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286216 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286210 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286210 |
Can you please provide the relevant code? It is hard to fully understand the issue without it. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286176 |
Post edited: added relevant tags + removed irrelevant ones |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286163 | Question closed | — | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286168 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: WPF MVVM ListBox not updating I haven't worked in WPF for a long time, but you might try setting a new list (clone the old one and add the new element) instead of adding the element to the existing list: ```c# demo.Value++; var newList = new List(demo.AllValues); newList.Add(demo.Value); demo.AllValues = newList; OnProper... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286163 |
Post edited: added relevant tags |
— | about 3 years ago |
Edit | Post #286164 |
Post edited: added relevant tag |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286164 |
Does it work if you set a new list (clone the old one and add the new element) instead of adding the element to the existing list? (basically, the bound value is immutable) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
Comment | Post #286151 |
Please post your compilation errors as text, not as an image. Check [this post](https://software.codidact.com/posts/284871) for more details. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |