Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for ajv
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #283672 |
`git show-branch master topic^` is how I eventually dealt with the case I was facing, but as you say, that has its own issues. I do use `git log --oneline --graph --boundary master...topic` a lot, and that's often good enough, but for nontrivial histories it's hard to visually pick out which commits ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283672 |
After experimenting a bit, it looks like I only run into a problem if the tip of one branch is a merge of the other. e.g. consider a history like this:
```
master *---*---A---B---*
\ \
topic a---b---c---*
```
If I then do `git show-branch master topic`, it do... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283672 |
I did see --more, but I don't think it suits this use case. I'm not looking for 10 or 30 or 100 additional commits; I'm looking for "however many are needed to cover all commits that differ between the branches." (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281160 |
Thanks. Not quite the answer I *wanted*, but exactly what I asked for. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281159 |
Edited for clarity and I'll add an example in a moment. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281159 |
YAML is my favored format, yes, but an ideal solution would be file-format-agnostic. E.g. python's dictconfig doesn't care what kind of file (if any) your input dict came from, as long as it has the right keys. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277485 |
Thanks. That makes sense, though the choice of method still seems crazy to me. I would think it would be simpler -- and definitely clearer -- to cast it to date and then cast back to DT.
(or just...not cast it back and use the date as is. The difference wasn't important in-context) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |