Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for toraritte
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #291459 |
Exactly what I needed. Thanks:) (more) |
— | 8 days ago |
| Comment | Post #291228 |
Well, it surely wasn't obvious to me right away, but once it clicked, I was surprised how I could've missed such an easy step. Thanks again and have a great day! (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291228 |
Thank you for the clarification! I made an edit suggestion lining up the terms - it took me unnecessarily long to understand it as I have no experience in theorem proving, so "explain it to me like I'm 5" is how I roll for now.. Is my assumption correct that you picked `h = switch f` intuitively? (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291232 |
Thank you again! (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291228 |
Wow, the simplicity of this blew my mind. Did you come up with this on the spot or is this a well known formula in other (pure) functional programming languages?
I'm also trying to make sense how `id` can be the first argument to `>=>`, so here's another question if you are interested: [Why does `le... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291217 |
Oh wow, I feel like an idiot - thank you for pointing out the error in my reasoning! (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291125 |
Thank you again! I just moved my comments into an answer, and also quoted an answer from Stackoverflow that confirms my assumptions. Have a great day! (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #291125 |
Thank you for the encouragement! I thought about that, because those points do sound plausible, but I have just started out with .NET in earnest, so it is just guesswork. I also didn't want to discourage answers.
If no-one refutes those points in a day or two, I'll definitely post them as answers... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290488 |
The SE thread [What is your way to create good passwords that can actually be remembered?](https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/662/what-is-your-way-to-create-good-passwords-that-can-actually-be-remembered) ([archived](https://web.archive.org/web/20230601214152/https://security.stackexchange.... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290329 |
It was the latter (i.e., present finding in an answer). How would you clarify the question? The question arose from my ignorance of how a browser makes sure that a website's SSL certificate is valid. (Hm, perhaps I should put "HTTP" in the question.) I also aimed to ask a fairly general question to i... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290226 |
Thanks, but please don't bother - I just realized that the books I've been reading were written before .NET Core, when it probably made more sense to use it... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290227 |
Thanks! I figured as much, and, at this point, I'm just going to use my question to document stuff I find:) (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290226 |
Thank you for the answer! I did some digging in the meantime, and indeed the consensus is that using `paket` pays off mostly when the project reaches a certain level of complexity.
So I'm not going to worry about it as my project is not a big one. What gnaws at me is that I can't figure out why it... (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290197 |
Thank you! I added it to my answer. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290189 |
To the point, and explains exactly how it should be done without getting lost in specifics. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289948 |
Your comment is so spot on: I didn't realize how misleading the word "program" would be, so one would naturally think of "software" or "application", when I'm talking about "federal / state program for non-profits to be able to provide services".
Thank you so much for pointing this out!
(more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289948 |
Never heard of it, but by the sound of it I would say yes:) Thank you also for your question regarding performance, because I should have foreseen how this would be an important aspect. The answer is that performance is not an important factor:
There are only a couple hundred clients a year, less... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289975 |
Thank you for providing real-world examples!
The example in the question is indeed from an introductory book to logical database design (Database Design for Mere Mortals), and the author points out several times that some aspects may not be possible with a given RDBMS / not easy to implement.
I wa... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289948 |
> Does a table for program A have different columns from an analogous table for program B? Is it possible to make a reasonable design where creating a new program is as simple as inserting some rows? I would assume not, but the requirements you listed don't jump out at me as things that should requir... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289948 |
> you haven't really provided enough information to answer that question, at least not clearly.
I didn't want to inundate readers with the details when the database structures are indeed fundamentally different (should have spelled this out probably), and the only entities common are the clients a... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289948 |
> The structure of this question is kind of awkward. [..] What I think your actual question is is "what is a good software architecture for your problem".
You are right, and this is not a good question, but one that reflects my ignorance in this topic. Also, your suggestion is right, but spending ... (more) |
— | 7 months ago |