Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Do we want MathJax?

Parent

Do we want MathJax?

+5
−1

Some Codidact communities have MathJax enabled, which allows using mathematical notation in posts. For examples of what this looks like, see the end of the Mathematics Codidact formatting help.

Would this community like MathJax to be enabled? I couldn't find a previous discussion of this on Meta.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−0

There is a small oddity wherein this post shows up strangely in list pages:

Regex to get text outside brackets

I am trying to capture the content outside square brackets in groups, using this regex: (.*)\[.*?\](.*) And it works perfectly for a simple string like this: testing_[_is_]_done This is the…

If code blocks are not supposed to appear on list pages, is MathJax?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

MathJax should show, but this bug shouldn't (4 comments)
MathJax should show, but this bug shouldn't
trichoplax‭ wrote 1 day ago · edited 1 day ago

MathJax is useful on list pages (look through Mathematics for examples in titles, or Physics for examples in body text), but what you've found doesn't show as MathJax in the individual question page, only as a bug on the question list page.

I don't know the cause of this bug, but it seems there are 2 separate questions here:

  1. Should this bug show? (I would say no)
  2. Should intentional MathJax show? (I would say yes)
trichoplax‭ wrote 1 day ago

If the Software Codidact community decides to switch off MathJax to avoid this bug, or to request MathJax be switched off just for the list pages, the bug will still need to be addressed for other communities such as Mathematics Codidact.

I'd guess it would make sense for the bug to be raised on main Meta to separate it from this local decision.

trichoplax‭ wrote about 5 hours ago

Thanks for raising MathJax on list pages on main Meta. Mentioning for anyone else reading this who might want to contribute to the discussion there.

Michael‭ wrote about 3 hours ago

Not exactly a well-received question, but thanks for linking it. =)