Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Are reference requests welcome here?

Parent

Are reference requests welcome here?

+5
−0

On that other site that shall not be named, reference request questions are outlawed as "asking for an off-site resource".

What do you guys think about such questions? Should they be welcome here? Any specific things to keep in mind when asking such questions?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)
Post
+7
−0

Consider the following posts which have essentially become canonical references in their own right within their respective communities on SE:

The mere existence of such posts on a Q&A site is not without controversy, however. These gather subjective responses, and could be hijacked by spammers seeking to promote their books, courses, videos, podcasts, etc.

Some helpful reading while reflecting on this includes:

If this were to be implemented, I think it would be best as a separate category, perhaps named “Resources.”

On the flip side, there are already a lot of great resources for software developers out there, such as the awesome lists which cover a myriad of languages and topics.

Some questions to ponder:

  • Would such posts require a single wiki-based response or would multiple posts be allowed?
  • If multiple posts, is voting still a good tool for distinguishing between posts?
  • What are strategies to prevent such posts being hijacked by spammers?
  • Do we currently allow targeted questions asking for a (albeit subjective) review of a specific resource (e.g., is Accelerated C++ still a good book to learn the basics of C++ from or is too outdated and should now be avoided?)?
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (6 comments)
General comments
Lundin‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago

The C book list on SO is not canonical, it's a complete fiasco and a perfect example of how horribly wrong community-maintained resource collections can go when they aren't actually maintained. Note the "Warning!" disclaimer on top of the post and the meta discussion.

qohelet‭ wrote about 4 years ago

Good to know, @Lundin !

Lundin‭ wrote about 4 years ago

I've been fighting a losing battle to get that one as well as the "list of random books that exist and some might even be about programming" deleted. SE community managers went in and bandwagon'd the user elected moderators who attempted to delete them, because traffic = $$$.

Lundin‭ wrote about 4 years ago

Anyway, I think such recommendation lists may work out well if they are extensively curated and there are rules for them. I tried to make a push for quality here but nobody was interested in that. From what I hear the C++ book list is of decent quality still though.

qohelet‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Lundin The C++ list is the main one I'm aware is referenced actively even by non-SO users. The others I threw in as additional examples, but apparently are examples of what not to do.

meriton‭ wrote about 4 years ago

I am not surprised the C book list went of the rails if voting was disabled for years, everybody could edit the list at whim, and the form of the community wiki answer discouraged offering evidence for or against a particular book. Since we don't have to repeat these mistakes, we might see better results.