Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on What is the point of tagging a question with both a parent and a child tag?

Parent

What is the point of tagging a question with both a parent and a child tag?

+4
−0

On the old sites, if you wanted to tag something with [sql] and [mysql] that required two tags. However, because we have hierarchal tags where [mysql] is a child of [sql] you only need to tag it with [mysql] to have it come up in the search for the [sql] tag.

I am wondering what the use case here would be for tagging it with both as it will show up in the search by tag for both [sql] and [mysql] either way.

Personally, I think it would be cleaner if only one tag from a grandparent->parent->child relationship was used on a question.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
Post
+3
−0

I can provide an answer based on Stack Overflow experience. SO offered watches by tags. By using a general tag along with a more specific tag, users interested in [sql] will also get the question in their feed.

While I could find this feature on Codidact, it makes sense to implement it in the future, when the question volume justifies this type of notification (by tags).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments
dmckee‭ wrote about 4 years ago

This. But if we wanted a “don’t add the parent tags” ethos locally we could compensate with a do/don’t include child tags options when registering a favorited tag.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

"By using a general tag along with a more specific tag, users interested in [sql] will also get the question in their feed." I would hope that users who watch the [sql] tag would get [mysql] questions without needing those questions to be tagged [sql].

Alexei‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Moshi That would be great and intuitive for anyone using such a feature.