Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on How do I communicate with a subproject in qmake?

Post

How do I communicate with a subproject in qmake?

+4
−0

When working with a qmake subdirs project you may want to share configuration between multiple projects. In a less common case you may including a external project within your own as code and want to configure the build of the included project.

Either way, the solution is to communicate decisions made in the master project to it's subprojects.

But how?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Clarify scope in title/body (3 comments)
Clarify scope in title/body
Derek Elkins‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Can you include a reference to qmake in the title and/or body of the question and not just have the tag do this work? Without looking at the tag, the question seems too broad to be answerable, and it's only when one notices the tag that the scope becomes clear.

dmckee‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Is that better? If not feel free to suggest something you like better.

Derek Elkins‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Yep, that works. Thanks.